☰
d2jsp
Rules
Help
Forum Gold FAQ
Live Streams
Photo Gallery
Hourly Raffle
Ladder Slasher
Log In
Register
Log In
Register
Account Recovery
Resend Validation Email
d2jsp Forums
>
d2jsp
>
Site Suggestions
>
Site Suggestions Archive
>
Poll > Making Welching A Lock/scam Tagg-able Offense
1
2
Next
Closed
New Topic
New Poll
Views: 453
Replies: 13
Track Topic
Guests cannot view or vote in polls. Please
register
or
login
.
Flopps
Member
Posts: 77,899
Joined: Jun 12 2008
Gold
:
47.00
#1
May 25 2010 08:56pm
This is to discuss locking welchers, and/or labeling them as a scammer with sufficient proof.
Basically like scamming in diablo 2, just welching.
Please choose and explain why.
Regards, Adam
Rapture
Member
Posts: 66,644
Joined: Oct 8 2005
Gold
:
7,830.00
#2
May 25 2010 09:09pm
I voted no, because D2jsp says it doesn't support betting, so i don't really see the argument here.
I think you should maybe just be content with not banning people who play poker versus FG ?
WGUS
Member
Posts: 22,435
Joined: Oct 11 2007
Gold
:
1,021.31
Trader:
Trusted
#3
May 25 2010 09:11pm
It should be a lockable/taggable offense imo, but only if sufficient proof has been given and/or shown.
Such as screenshots & video. Along with links to threads and whatnot.
Flopps
Member
Posts: 77,899
Joined: Jun 12 2008
Gold
:
47.00
#4
May 25 2010 09:12pm
Quote (WGUS @ May 25 2010 10:11pm)
It should be a lockable/taggable offense imo, but only if sufficient proof has been given and/or shown.
Such as screenshots & video. Along with links to threads and whatnot.
That's what sufficient proof is saying.
Chinlc
Member
Posts: 12,884
Joined: Nov 19 2009
Gold
:
500.69
Warn: 10%
#5
May 25 2010 09:12pm
Voted null, but won't happen because as djinni said, betting isn't "allowed' here.
This post was edited by Chinlc on May 25 2010 09:13pm
Gwarr
Member
Posts: 36,249
Joined: Feb 10 2008
Gold
:
4,377.00
Trader:
Trusted
#6
May 25 2010 10:44pm
Quote (djinni @ May 25 2010 10:09pm)
I voted no, because D2jsp says it doesn't support betting, so i don't really see the argument here.
I think you should maybe just be content with not banning people who play poker versus FG ?
That pretty much sums it up.
This post was edited by Gwarr on May 25 2010 10:45pm
OKC
Member
Posts: 26,079
Joined: Jul 16 2008
Gold
:
Locked
#7
May 25 2010 10:48pm
Clearly stated that Betting is not supported by D2Jsp. Its at your own risk. So no.
Flopps
Member
Posts: 77,899
Joined: Jun 12 2008
Gold
:
47.00
#8
May 26 2010 09:51am
Simply make it supported, and mediate it as it should be. This is happening way too much.
Boss
Member
Posts: 20,726
Joined: Jan 2 2007
Gold
:
94,877.84
#9
May 26 2010 09:57am
nah
Sane
Member
Posts: 22,693
Joined: Jul 18 2006
Gold
:
68,071.02
Trader:
Trusted
#10
May 26 2010 10:01am
Quote (djinni @ 26 May 2010 05:09)
I voted no, because D2jsp says it doesn't support betting, so i don't really see the argument here.
I think you should maybe just be content with not banning people who play poker versus FG ?
totally agree.
Go Back To
Site Suggestions Archive
Topic List
1
2
Next
Closed
New Topic
New Poll
© 2003-2026 d2jsp
Contact