d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > d2jsp > Site Suggestions > Site Suggestions Archive > Am I Doing Something Wrong > Or Is This A "site Suggestion"
Closed New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 18,513
Joined: Dec 17 2005
Gold: 53.50
Mar 17 2010 09:14pm
This website is occupied by so many retarded people who have the tag: mediator, moderator, and trusted.
On top of that, it seems that women are more respected and apparently have 300% more value on JSP. Especially males with these tags who roam around JSP to search for girls and give them high credibility.
Two days later, that user will be on top of everyone and 3 days later she will have a tag just like them.

You also realize that these people tend to troll around JSP giving people warns to those they do not like. And of course, the ones in favor do not get a warn, even though they commit the same violations. I'm glad this website is filled with bunch of corrupted scripts and the people who run them are bunch of under-minded unintelligent people who are very immature.

Site suggestion: Mediators, Moderators, or Trusted tagged people needs to have the option to get banned / lose their tag for favoring another group if proof is provided.

I think this suggestion should be valid since there are trusted tagged people who lose their tag for vouching a legitimate trade.

I see site suggestions; therefore, I am looking for responders, not having this thread locked because you tagged people are offended by simple-minded criticism. You only further my explanation into facts.
Member
Posts: 8,798
Joined: Jun 23 2007
Gold: 0.01
Mar 17 2010 09:15pm
i think they are the favored group
Member
Posts: 17,776
Joined: Jan 6 2005
Gold: 19,634.96
Trader: Trusted
Mar 17 2010 09:23pm
Quote (RecenT @ Mar 17 2010 08:14pm)
On top of that, it seems that women are more respected and apparently have 300% more value on JSP. Especially males with these tags who roam around JSP to search for girls


Welcome to the internet. Please enjoy your stay.

The terms of service of d2jsp don't offer fairness or democracy anywhere in them. This is an internet forum run by an administrator who is basically God as far as d2jsp is concerned. As such, sometimes things my seem unfair to some users.

This post was edited by krazi_mofo111 on Mar 17 2010 09:23pm
Member
Posts: 18,513
Joined: Dec 17 2005
Gold: 53.50
Mar 17 2010 09:57pm
Quote (krazi_mofo111 @ Mar 18 2010 03:23am)
Welcome to the internet. Please enjoy your stay.

The terms of service of d2jsp don't offer fairness or democracy anywhere in them. This is an internet forum run by an administrator who is basically God as far as d2jsp is concerned. As such, sometimes things my seem unfair to some users.


I'm glad you understand, but it is not "sometimes things may seem unfair". "Sometimes things are unfair to some users" would be a more suitable word.
An administrator is God, and God does not make mistakes ( for those who are strong believer in god ).

Just wanted to point out that Njaguar likes to make mistakes and never fix them. And the mediators, moderators, and trusted tagged members are corrupted with their ability to think they overpower everyone because they were favored by some other tagged member before becoming one themself. I do not refer this to every member who are tagged, but majority of them are rather illiterate.

Thanks for taking your time reading, and I'm glad I have informed you that "your" people are desperate for little girls, bias, and stupid.

This message does not refer to every tagged member, do not take offense because you know who you are. You take that one second to think to yourself, "am I one of them?" Yes you are.

This post was edited by RecenT on Mar 17 2010 09:58pm
Member
Posts: 8,798
Joined: Jun 23 2007
Gold: 0.01
Mar 17 2010 10:00pm
Quote (RecenT @ Mar 17 2010 10:57pm)
I'm glad you understand, but it is not "sometimes things may seem unfair". "Sometimes things are unfair to some users" would be a more suitable word.
An administrator is God, and God does not make mistakes ( for those who are strong believer in god ).

Just wanted to point out that Njaguar likes to make mistakes and never fix them. And the mediators, moderators, and trusted tagged members are corrupted with their ability to think they overpower everyone because they were favored by some other tagged member before becoming one themself. I do not refer this to every member who are tagged, but majority of them are rather illiterate.

Thanks for taking your time reading, and I'm glad I have informed you that "your" people are desperate for little girls, bias, and stupid.

This message does not refer to every tagged member, do not take offense because you know who you are. You take that one second to think to yourself, "am I one of them?" Yes you are.


what do you see happeniing by posting this?
you cant possibly think anything will change
at most you will probably just get warned and suspended
so why waste your time
not being a dick
just stating the obvious
Member
Posts: 18,513
Joined: Dec 17 2005
Gold: 53.50
Mar 17 2010 10:03pm
Quote (skrewzrloose @ Mar 18 2010 04:00am)
what do you see happeniing by posting this?
you cant possibly think anything will change
at most you will probably just get warned and suspended
so why waste your time
not being a dick
just stating the obvious


Moderators, Mediators, and Trusted tagged members should have something such as "credits". To do their job, they are rewarded so long as proof is provided. To do stupid shit and not their job, with proof provided, should lose their credibility, or even their tagged.

Why: Because these tagged members should already be well aware of the rules, and all the rules of JSP. Have someone else be a tagged member if they are not to reinforce these rules because we don't need immature kids abusing their ass off.

I honestly don't care because the ones who would suspend me are the ones who believe I'm bashing for no apparent reason, and that all mediators, moderator, and trusted tagged members are well aware of the rules and they also apply them and do their job when obviously they do not.

This post was edited by RecenT on Mar 17 2010 10:05pm
Member
Posts: 16,558
Joined: Jan 18 2008
Gold: 0.00
Mar 17 2010 10:08pm
Quote (RecenT @ Mar 17 2010 11:03pm)
Moderators, Mediators, and Trusted tagged members should have something such as "credits". To do their job, they are rewarded so long as proof is provided. To do stupid shit and not their job, with proof provided, should lose their credibility, or even their tagged.

Why: Because these tagged members should already be well aware of the rules, and all the rules of JSP. Have someone else be a tagged member if they are not to reinforce these rules because we don't need immature kids abusing their ass off.


Good luck with this Tai, what a shame that we know it'll never happen
Member
Posts: 3,545
Joined: Jun 24 2008
Gold: Locked
Warn: 10%
Mar 17 2010 10:11pm
Quote
This website is occupied by so many retarded people who have the tag: mediator, moderator, and trusted.


Opinions are subjective in nature.

Quote
On top of that, it seems that women are more respected and apparently have 300% more value on JSP. Especially males with these tags who roam around JSP to search for girls and give them high credibility.


Yes, the idea of communicating with a member of the opposite sex is quite arousing.

Quote
Two days later, that user will be on top of everyone and 3 days later she will have a tag just like them.


Quote
You also realize that these people tend to troll around JSP giving people warns to those they do not like. And of course, the ones in favor do not get a warn, even though they commit the same violations. I'm glad this website is filled with bunch of corrupted scripts and the people who run them are bunch of under-minded unintelligent people who are very immature.


I agree, although the entire world operates in such a manner.

Quote
Site suggestion: Mediators, Moderators, or Trusted tagged people needs to have the option to get banned / lose their tag for favoring another group if proof is provided.


I have seen tagged people stripped and even warned. This actually does happen, believe it or not. Even without the vouching aspect as mentioned below:

Quote
I think this suggestion should be valid since there are trusted tagged people who lose their tag for vouching a legitimate trade.


You reinforce the notion that people do lose their privilege tags. What is the purpose of this thread? Vouching is spam which is ultimately against the forum rules.

Retired Moderator
Posts: 48,115
Joined: Apr 27 2007
Gold: 31,374.06
Trader: Trusted
Mar 17 2010 10:11pm
if you have a problem with a member of the team pm balakai
Go Back To Site Suggestions Archive Topic List
Closed New Topic New Poll