d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > d2jsp > Site Suggestions > Site Suggestions Archive >
Poll > Make A "services" Subforum For Grushing And Such
Closed New Topic New Poll
  Guests cannot view or vote in polls. Please register or login.
Member
Posts: 1,254
Joined: Oct 15 2008
Gold: 0.00
Dec 27 2009 06:31pm
Well here goes my first purchased topic...

In my opinion, the event system is very awkward and hard to navigate through to get what you are looking for when you need it. Just making regular Grush/Uber topics as I did before the event system (even though I was formally warned) was much easier and worth the minimal risk of a warn, as well as responding to legal iso topics. It's a shame that jsp has spent so much time in the event system in an attempt to remedy the trading forums of this due to the whole "trusted tag" BS, (How many "Trusteds" are there on this site? 100 or so??) and that the system has turned out the way that it has. With grushing/ubers and such out of the event system, there would be much more room for organizing guild events, duel tournaments, ironmans and stuff like that.
Member
Posts: 12,260
Joined: May 20 2007
Gold: 1,013.00
Dec 27 2009 06:32pm
They did, its located here

http://forums.d2jsp.org/events.php
imo i dont think much more is needed, if people needing/offering services would just use it...

This post was edited by Anemoii on Dec 27 2009 06:33pm
Member
Posts: 18,697
Joined: Jul 5 2007
Gold: 1,400.00
Dec 27 2009 06:38pm
Quote (Anemoii @ Dec 27 2009 07:32pm)
They did, its located here

http://forums.d2jsp.org/events.php
imo i dont think much more is needed, if people needing/offering services would just use it...


I would strongly disagree with you.
As a mediator, there are massive and severe risks involved with mediating this user events. The format of the event system is extremely user unfriendly in terms of you do not know who comes, goes, joins the event, exits the event, discharged from the event or sabotages a game.

This puts trusted users in a very awkward and vulnerable position. Also, the event system has limited the way services can be present making formal service being hosted nearly impossible especially for things that do not user "uber levels" such as Classic Diablo 2.

As for a user perspective, especially myself as a former service host, the event system forced me to stop hosting and making services due to the restrictions and forced position of settings. There is no longer open concept or controlled concept to lay down a foundation to run a civilized service.

Member
Posts: 15,094
Joined: Aug 28 2006
Gold: 173.01
Dec 28 2009 09:13am
Quote (przy @ Dec 27 2009 06:38pm)
I would strongly disagree with you.
As a mediator, there are massive and severe risks involved with mediating this user events. The format of the event system is extremely user unfriendly in terms of you do not know who comes, goes, joins the event, exits the event, discharged from the event or sabotages a game.

This puts trusted users in a very awkward and vulnerable position. Also, the event system has limited the way services can be present making formal service being hosted nearly impossible especially for things that do not user "uber levels" such as Classic Diablo 2.

As for a user perspective, especially myself as a former service host, the event system forced me to stop hosting and making services due to the restrictions and forced position of settings. There is no longer open concept or controlled concept to lay down a foundation to run a civilized service.


If you are one who would like to offer services, and is with out a "Trusted" tag.
Its difficult at best to offer in return for Fg that you may or may not recieve.

Hypothesis:

If you meet the criteria to offer any services. (Criteria set by a D2jsp supervisor and or moderator)
Join date and post count should be considered.
Along with the amount of Fg they have.

You should be able to set the rules as you are in care , control or custody of the services or situation.
In my humble opnion, there should be a limited set of requirement for what services you wish to offer.

I think they should revamp the tags and have a tag just for services (meets the said qualafications/spefications of supervisor/moderator)

For the one who has a service to offer Shall have a Set of rules that are to be implimented and Shall have a policy to follow.
And Shall make that information known and stated along with the "services thread"

i.e.
Gubers prices / lvl
per/ hour
no casting any spells (auras, battle commands, summons ect.)
No talking unless you use the "Over head chat feature"
no refunds/ yes refunds

Then to have that information and or plan checked and questioned by a D2jsp supervisor for any flaws or defects.(for a nominal fee, cause nobody's time is for free)
If the service in its entirety is up to Par, the individual should be entitled to offer his services at his discretion with a handy dandy tag for such services.
And maybe even need to pay a monthly fee to maintain there "Trusted services Tag"'
It has both potential and liability,
Enjoy


~~Fin
Member
Posts: 8,149
Joined: Nov 19 2009
Gold: 208,160.05
Dec 28 2009 09:15am
i woult say no , to much work for mediator's , and so
Go Back To Site Suggestions Archive Topic List
Closed New Topic New Poll