Atm , many guys who have high warn have to ask in GH forum how long they have to wait and ask mods to warn remove. It's pointless. They lose time, and mods lose time to checking and answering. Wouldn't it be easier when high warns will be allowed to checking their own profiles and warnlogs??


ATTACK ON YES !! GO GO

Calling them "naps" isnt good..

No if they gained warn to not click their warn logs they deserved it

lol i knew naps like u will be posting, look at time of mods, why they have to bother mods who have to answer that threads??

plz don't post shit like " no they deserved warn, so they have to ask in GH " asking in GH means more spam, and bothering mods.

and i am only talking about checking their own profiles, not other users, just their own to check warnlog and finally press " request warn removal "

This post was edited by zBOAz on Dec 23 2009 07:57am

Mods are here for helping
they are not bothering or something like that

No; I think its good that if you wind up with 70-90% warn and you want it removed, you should have to humble yourself in front of everyone and publicly ask for its removal.

Do you even know what the word nap means, lollerwaffles.

wont happen, Paul already said that.

voted for NO

uhm .. dnu ... yes/no ...

if someone wants to wait 2-6 months for 10% removal without getting +10%
than that's quite an achievement already, assuming he/she didn't multi

this public humiliation feature might cause 70%+ spammers not to +1 in GH
than again... if 10-60% didn't complicate things enough already for them to stop misbehaving,
then it's time for added measures

I have to vote no here. At 70% they loose the right to view their warnlog, and I think it is for the best this way. They loose their rights for a reason

I have seen trusteds who think this is a good idea too.

I myself, dont care so much if yes or no, maybe yes?