d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > d2jsp > Site Suggestions > Site Suggestions Archive >
Poll > Suggestion To Block Warned/tagged Users Posts
12Next
Closed New Topic New Poll
  Guests cannot view or vote in polls. Please register or login.
Member
Posts: 10,876
Joined: Dec 13 2008
Gold: 27.56
Warn: 100%
Dec 20 2009 06:46pm
hi dear community,

i'd like to be able to choose whos users posts i can read and whos not so i figured to suggest a section in the settings where we could block single user groups, users with xx% warn(for example: we can choose: do you like to block users from: [ ] 10%, [ ] 20%, [ ] 30%, [ ] 40%, [x] 50%, [ ] 60%, [ ] 70%, [ ] 80%, [ ] 90% - Warn upwards.) and scammers.

i dont think it would be unfair to users with warn/tag because they have the choice to either obey the rules or earn warn. but there are too many users at the sub-forums who post with the only motivation in insult, flame and annoy other users on this board.

btw i had some warn too and it was my fault i had the choice, too. i think i as ex-affected am able to rate the fairness situation :P

once again clearly what i suggest:
a section were we could choose between 10% and 90% and scammer tag
posts by users with the chosen % of warn or the chosen tag will not be displayed anymore

regards :)
Member
Posts: 48,198
Joined: Nov 10 2008
Gold: 95.00
Dec 20 2009 06:58pm
i say screw anyone above 50%
:rofl:
Member
Posts: 16,558
Joined: Jan 18 2008
Gold: 0.00
Dec 20 2009 07:00pm
Quote (Jayy @ Dec 20 2009 07:46pm)
hi dear community,

i'd like to be able to choose whos users posts i can read and whos not so i figured to suggest a section in the settings where we could block single user groups, users with xx% warn(for example: we can choose: do you like to block users from: [  ] 10%, [  ] 20%, [  ] 30%, [  ] 40%, [x] 50%, [  ] 60%, [  ] 70%, [  ] 80%, [  ] 90% - Warn upwards.) and scammers.

i dont think it would be unfair to users with warn/tag because they have the choice to either obey the rules or earn warn. but there are too many users at the sub-forums who post with the only motivation in insult, flame and annoy other users on this board.

btw i had some warn too and it was my fault i had the choice, too. i think i as ex-affected am able to rate the fairness situation :P

once again clearly what i suggest:
a section were we could choose between 10% and 90% and scammer tag
posts by users with the chosen % of warn or the chosen tag will not be displayed anymore

regards :)


What. Certain sections do block after certain warn percentages, why are you suggesting adding more sub-forums just for people who can dodge warns?

Makes little to no sense.
Member
Posts: 10,876
Joined: Dec 13 2008
Gold: 27.56
Warn: 100%
Dec 20 2009 07:12pm
Quote (Fear_Everlasting @ Dec 21 2009 02:00am)
What. Certain sections do block after certain warn percentages, why are you suggesting adding more sub-forums just for people who can dodge warns?

Makes little to no sense.


i dont suggest new sub forums
Member
Posts: 16,558
Joined: Jan 18 2008
Gold: 0.00
Dec 20 2009 07:16pm
Quote (Jayy @ Dec 20 2009 08:12pm)
i dont suggest new sub forums


Quote (Jayy @ Dec 20 2009 07:46pm)
hi dear community,

i'd like to be able to choose whos users posts i can read and whos not so i figured to suggest a section in the settings where we could block single user groups, users with xx% warn(for example: we can choose: do you like to block users from: [  ] 10%, [  ] 20%, [  ] 30%, [  ] 40%, [x] 50%, [  ] 60%, [  ] 70%, [  ] 80%, [  ] 90% - Warn upwards.) and scammers.

i dont think it would be unfair to users with warn/tag because they have the choice to either obey the rules or earn warn. but there are too many users at the sub-forums who post with the only motivation in insult, flame and annoy other users on this board.

btw i had some warn too and it was my fault i had the choice, too. i think i as ex-affected am able to rate the fairness situation :P

once again clearly what i suggest:
a section were we could choose between 10% and 90% and scammer tag
posts by users with the chosen % of warn or the chosen tag will not be displayed anymore

regards :)


Then what is the bold,Underline,Italic suggesting?

Again, some forums have warn caps where you can't post after certain warn, but not all forums have it (or will get it). So I don't see what you are suggesting.

/e I kind of see it now, you're suggesting blocking the posts of people with warn and such.

However, that is quite a useless idea.

This post was edited by Fear_Everlasting on Dec 20 2009 07:17pm
Member
Posts: 1,699
Joined: May 6 2009
Gold: 0.07
Dec 20 2009 07:20pm
wtfno.
Member
Posts: 57,889
Joined: May 23 2007
Gold: 0.00
Dec 20 2009 07:23pm
It will not happen.
Member
Posts: 70,577
Joined: Dec 17 2005
Gold: 9,004.00
Dec 20 2009 07:25pm
Nah, their posts aren't any worse than someone else's.
Warns are often given for dumb reasons anyway.
Member
Posts: 10,876
Joined: Dec 13 2008
Gold: 27.56
Warn: 100%
Dec 20 2009 07:32pm
Quote (Fear_Everlasting @ Dec 21 2009 02:16am)
Then what is the bold,Underline,Italic suggesting?

Again, some forums have warn caps where you can't post after certain warn, but not all forums have it (or will get it). So I don't see what you are suggesting.

/e I kind of see it now, you're suggesting blocking the posts of people with warn and such.

However, that is quite a useless idea.


a section in the settings :/
Member
Posts: 21,259
Joined: Sep 14 2008
Gold: 1,000.27
Dec 20 2009 07:35pm
Quote (Jayy @ Dec 21 2009 01:46pm)
hi dear community,

i'd like to be able to choose whos users posts i can read and whos not so i figured to suggest a section in the settings where we could block single user groups, users with xx% warn(for example: we can choose: do you like to block users from: [ ] 10%, [ ] 20%, [ ] 30%, [ ] 40%, [x] 50%, [ ] 60%, [ ] 70%, [ ] 80%, [ ] 90% - Warn upwards.) and scammers.

i dont think it would be unfair to users with warn/tag because they have the choice to either obey the rules or earn warn. but there are too many users at the sub-forums who post with the only motivation in insult, flame and annoy other users on this board.

btw i had some warn too and it was my fault i had the choice, too. i think i as ex-affected am able to rate the fairness situation :P

once again clearly what i suggest:
a section were we could choose between 10% and 90% and scammer tag
posts by users with the chosen % of warn or the chosen tag will not be displayed anymore

regards :)


Your suggestion makes little or no sense, so no.
Go Back To Site Suggestions Archive Topic List
12Next
Closed New Topic New Poll