d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > d2jsp > Site Suggestions > Site Suggestions Archive >
Poll > Diablo 3 General Discussion 10% Warn Restriction
Closed New Topic New Poll
  Guests cannot view or vote in polls. Please register or login.
Member
Posts: 20,165
Joined: Dec 5 2007
Gold: 692.20
Oct 25 2009 05:42pm
As a user who regularly visits and is known for posting a lot of news in the Diablo 3 general discussion forum, a lot of spam takes place in this forum.

My suggestion is that at 10% warn, you are unable to post in the Diablo 3 general discussion forum, similar to how you are unable to post in the Love Line forums when you get 10% warn.

Here are the benefits to implementing my suggestion:

1) The users who spam a lot, generally already have at least 10% warn. This alone will weed out a ton of spammers.
2) Users who do spam a lot but do not have 10% warn, will think twice before spamming since if they do get 10% they will be unable to post in the Diablo 3 general discussion forum.
3) It will encourage users who already have warns to remain on good behavior so they can gain access back to the forums they were previously unable to post in.

I ask that users who already have a warn remain objective and do not vote no simply because you have a warn.

I'm looking for feedback, so if you vote, please make a post :)

This post was edited by NekoChild on Oct 25 2009 05:50pm
Member
Posts: 27,083
Joined: Apr 20 2008
Gold: 987.30
Oct 25 2009 07:46pm
Yes and No Neko.

Yes:

It would have a lot less spam, but a bit less discussion.

No:

Could add a lot less popularity to it.

But imo 10% warn - 30% warn = What it should be at.
Member
Posts: 20,165
Joined: Dec 5 2007
Gold: 692.20
Oct 25 2009 08:07pm
Quote (Yip12343 @ Oct 25 2009 09:46pm)
Yes and No Neko.

Yes:

It would have a lot less spam, but a bit less discussion.

No:

Could add a lot less popularity to it.

But imo 10% warn - 30% warn = What it should be at.

Hmm you do bring up valid points.

I'm not sure how much discussion would be compromised. I don't think it'd be a drastic difference. Perhaps 20-30% warn restriction is a better number. I'm fine with either.
Member
Posts: 21,519
Joined: Feb 7 2007
Gold: 14.75
Oct 25 2009 09:15pm
10 percent us fucking stupid and will never happen, same with just asking it to be for the diablo 3 general discussion.

Anything over 40 percent and you shouldn't be allowed access to outside the trading grounds and stuff would make way more sense.
Member
Posts: 20,165
Joined: Dec 5 2007
Gold: 692.20
Oct 25 2009 09:17pm
Quote
10 percent us fucking stupid and will never happen

It has already happened - there are multiple forums, such as Love Line, that users cannot post in with 10% warn or higher.
Member
Posts: 21,519
Joined: Feb 7 2007
Gold: 14.75
Oct 25 2009 09:20pm
Quote (NekoChild @ Oct 25 2009 11:17pm)
It has already happened - there are multiple forums, such as Love Line, that users cannot post in with 10% warn or higher.


That's an exception because love line takes a level of maturity 98 percent of people on this forum don't have, and in my personal opinion is just stupid to have on a D2 forum. That would never happen on D3 general discussion.
Go Back To Site Suggestions Archive Topic List
Closed New Topic New Poll