d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > d2jsp > Site Suggestions > Site Suggestions Archive >
Poll > Scammer's Accusation Forum Suggestion
1235Next
Closed New Topic New Poll
Views: 668Replies: 40Track Topic
  Guests cannot view or vote in polls. Please register or login.
Member
Posts: 36,137
Joined: Jun 17 2007
Gold: 0.00
#1
Jul 21 2009 05:35pm
Everybody knows that the S/A forum has been less active day by day.

I have a new suggestion to help with the Scammer's Accusation Forum.

When a Jsp User is accused of scamming or somewhat related and is being investigated.

The Mediator Or The Trusted Tagged user who is in charge should immediately LOCK the accused's Forum Gold till the investigation proves him or her's innocence.

If this suggestion is used, there will be less and less multi / scammers in the whole d2jsp community.

Most Scammers or the accused, sends their forum gold to their multiple accounts immediately when they've noticed that their names are mentioned in the scammer's accusation, mainly because they already know that they are guilty.

I really hope the Mediators and the Trusted tagged users will use this suggestion.

i will gladly be willing to help supervise over the Scammer's Accusations Forums if i were to be appointed a position, as if not appointed, it is against the d2jsp rule to help out in the scammer's accusation forum.

Here is an example: i had a scammer's accusation thread up since June 13th , 2009. i've received no mediator/trusted help whatsoever, only post i've gotten was "stop spam unless your accused/accuser etc"

http://forums.d2jsp.org/index.php?showtopic=32021952&f=250

edit: the investigation should take place when the victim provides ENOUGH evidence so randoms doesn't go "oh hey he scammed me, investigate him/her" or "hey lock him he scammed me"

This post was edited by mightyXbruins on Jul 21 2009 05:39pm
Member
Posts: 56,299
Joined: Jul 27 2007
Gold: 6.00
#2
Jul 21 2009 05:37pm
[x]YES

QUIT CLOSING SPAMS THREAD AND LOCK THOSE FUCKING SCAMMING CUNTS INSTED

FFS



/endrage
Member
Posts: 39,364
Joined: Oct 8 2007
Gold: 0.52
Warn: 40%
#3
Jul 21 2009 05:38pm
When a Jsp User is accused of scamming or somewhat related and is being investigated.

The Mediator Or The Trusted Tagged user who is in charge should immediately LOCK the accused's Forum Gold till the investigation proves him or her's innocence.


mightyxbruins scammed me, lock him temporarily please
Member
Posts: 20,952
Joined: Sep 25 2007
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 20%
#4
Jul 21 2009 05:38pm
What happens if some asshole just accuses to get a person he doesnt like locked?
Member
Posts: 22,346
Joined: Sep 21 2007
Gold: 145.06
#5
Jul 21 2009 05:38pm
Quote (XslayaX @ Tue, Jul 21 2009, 06:38pm)
What happens if some asshole just accuses to get a person he doesnt like locked?


this.
Member
Posts: 12,833
Joined: Apr 8 2009
Gold: 2,855.00
#6
Jul 21 2009 05:39pm
Quote (XslayaX @ Tue, Jul 21 2009, 07:38pm)
What happens if some asshole just accuses to get a person he doesnt like locked?


this.
Member
Posts: 36,137
Joined: Jun 17 2007
Gold: 0.00
#7
Jul 21 2009 05:40pm
Quote (XslayaX @ Tue, Jul 21 2009, 03:38pm)
What happens if some asshole just accuses to get a person he doesnt like locked?


Quote (Toilet @ Tue, Jul 21 2009, 03:38pm)
this.


i just edited and added on
Member
Posts: 48,874
Joined: Feb 6 2008
Gold: 12.03
#8
Jul 21 2009 05:40pm
Quote (XslayaX @ Tue, Jul 21 2009, 03:38pm)
What happens if some asshole just accuses to get a person he doesnt like locked?


Yes, this has already been suggested and would cause many problems. People would just go around saying, "xx scammed me, lock his Forum Gold" and that person's reputation as a trader would get hindered falsely as well as disable any trades he/she is currently doing.

Edit: The current system is already like that when users add enough evidence.

This post was edited by UsmanSimjee on Jul 21 2009 05:41pm
Member
Posts: 39,364
Joined: Oct 8 2007
Gold: 0.52
Warn: 40%
#9
Jul 21 2009 05:40pm
The Mediator Or The Trusted Tagged user who is in charge should immediately LOCK the accused's Forum Gold till the investigation proves him or her's innocence.

1 more thing, i thought it was innocent until proven guilty
not guilty until proven innocent?
Member
Posts: 375
Joined: Jun 30 2009
Gold: 2.00
#10
Jul 21 2009 05:41pm
learn to snitch less
Go Back To Site Suggestions Archive Topic List
1235Next
Closed New Topic New Poll

© 2003-2026 d2jsp  Contact