d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > d2jsp > Site Suggestions > Site Suggestions Archive >
Poll > Open The D2jsp Archives To The Community? > Do Not Comment, Only Vote Plz, N N Spam
1234Next
Closed New Topic New Poll
  Guests cannot view or vote in polls. Please register or login.
Member
Posts: 25,043
Joined: Jan 15 2008
Gold: 1.00
Nov 27 2008 02:19am
Below is a link to the previous poll which was closed due to off topic posts. Because of this I ask that nobody comment on this suggestion but instead simply vote their opinion. This is a serious suggestion and spam is not welcome. It is unfortunate that I have to make this request, but I see no other way to prevent unwarranted thread closures in the future. Once again, DO NOT COMMENT ON THIS SUGGESTION, ONLY VOTE.

http://forums.d2jsp.org/index.php?showtopic=25902071&f=258

Below is the text of the original suggestion,

Quote (oscillator @ Tue, 25 Nov 2008, 09:49)
"Cartoons don't die, they just get canned" -Yakko (the Animaniac)

Old posts don't get deleted either, they get moved to an archive. These archives can be accessed from D2jsp (for example, if you bookmark a thread and then revisit it several weeks or months later or if you visit the Archives subforum), however there is no simple way to access the entire year's posts. Only 100 pages of the archives can be browsed, which amounts to roughly three weeks worth of threads. I opine that D2jsp should facilitate access by the entire community to these forums where every old thread and topic is preserved. Furthermore, every month and post of the forum archives should be fully trackable and searchable.

After reading several confused posts, I offered the following clarification. The D2jsp archives are classified, and I propose to unclassify and publicize them for the benefit of the community at large,

Quote (oscillator @ Wed, 26 Nov 2008, 16:06)
I think you have misunderstood this suggestion. It isn't really intended to assist with revisting a thread that has been viewed recently, it is so that D2jsp users can benefit from six years worth of postings by going back and viewing them all. The archives only allow 100 pages of posts to be viewed for a given year which amounts to roughly three weeks out of fifty two for every year catalogged. Newer and older users alike would be able to take full advantage of D2jsp's history in a way that they are unable to do now.

D2jsp has a long history and it would be to everyone's benefit if traders were able to access this repository of knowledge. The previous poll concluded with 10 votes in favor, 7 votes against, and one abstention. While this reflects a favorable response by a majority of voters, I would like to air the idea out further. Once again, PLEASE ONLY VOTE DO NOT COMMENT. I would not like to have another thread closed due to some user's juvenile impulse to spam.

I also ask that you vote for this idea based on its merits, not your personal opinion of me or whether or not you think it has a chance of being implemented. The Site Suggestion subforum is supposed to reflect things as they should be, not as they are likely to turn out. Thank you for your patience and your vote.
Member
Posts: 72,812
Joined: Apr 11 2007
Gold: 3.00
Trader: Trusted
Nov 27 2008 04:04am
i always used to go threw searching very old topics but was unable to see them

so a yes from me
Banned
Posts: 12,486
Joined: Dec 10 2007
Gold: 5.96
Warn: 40%
Nov 27 2008 04:12am
Quote

I also ask that you vote for this idea based on its merits, not your personal opinion of me or whether or not you think it has a chance of being implemented. The Site Suggestion subforum is supposed to reflect things as they should be, not as they are likely to turn out. Thank you for your patience and your vote.


But if i'm not voting because of my personal opinion, then how am i supposed to vote. If i don't think it would work then that is my opinion, if i do that's my opinion aswell. Just doesn't make sense to me tbh.
What is the point of having a poll without an opinion everything would just be null. That's just what i've taken from what you've said anyway
Member
Posts: 25,043
Joined: Jan 15 2008
Gold: 1.00
Nov 27 2008 04:27am

Quote (oscillator @ Thu, 27 Nov 2008, 04:19)
I also ask that you vote for this idea based on its merits, not your personal opinion of me or whether or not you think it has a chance of being implemented.

Quote (a9ag @ Thu, 27 Nov 2008, 06:12)
But if i'm not voting because of my personal opinion, then how am i supposed to vote. If i don't think it would work then that is my opinion, if i do that's my opinion aswell. Just doesn't make sense to me tbh.
What is the point of having a poll without an opinion everything would just be null. That's just what i've taken from what you've said anyway

...your personal opinion of me. Please read carefully before voting or posting. In this case I have asked all prospective voters to refrain from commenting. Do not jump to judgement until you have read everything. Thank you for your cooperation. This poll is currently 5-1-1 in favor, demonstrating a clear support for this suggestion. I invite more D2jsp users to vote, everyone one of them counts.
Member
Posts: 25,043
Joined: Jan 15 2008
Gold: 1.00
Nov 28 2008 06:44am
Current polling stands at 5-2-2, demonstrating a majority of voter support for this idea. I would like more people to vote so please read the suggestion thoroughly and then click your opinion.
Member
Posts: 25,043
Joined: Jan 15 2008
Gold: 1.00
Nov 29 2008 02:16am

Quote (oscillator @ Fri, 28 Nov 2008, 08:44)
Current polling stands at 5-2-2, demonstrating a majority of voter support for this idea. I would like more people to vote so please read the suggestion thoroughly and then click your opinion.

Please vote, your opinion counts.
Member
Posts: 25,043
Joined: Jan 15 2008
Gold: 1.00
Nov 29 2008 04:22pm

Quote (oscillator @ Sat, 29 Nov 2008, 04:16)
Please vote, your opinion counts.

6-2-2, the ayes are expanding their lead over the nays. While voter turnout is low, those who have voted seem to overwhelmingly favor this suggestion.
Member
Posts: 30,717
Joined: Sep 19 2007
Gold: 254.00
Nov 29 2008 04:33pm
this would create expensive search queries and I think should only be accessible if you have to pay for it
cus theres no real reason to go searching through archives
Member
Posts: 29,427
Joined: Sep 17 2007
Gold: 742.59
Nov 29 2008 05:04pm
Very well put together.
I can see why searching the archives could be helpful.
I voted yes.
Member
Posts: 25,043
Joined: Jan 15 2008
Gold: 1.00
Nov 30 2008 03:14am

Quote (jbpellerin @ Sat, 29 Nov 2008, 18:33)
this would create expensive search queries and I think should only be accessible if you have to pay for it
cus theres no real reason to go searching through archives

Sure there is, D2jsp offers a wealth of Diablo 2 related information and I think everyone can benefit from that. Searches for old items, tracking down old members, or simply finding a few of those legendary threads that people like to put in their profile, there are ample reasons. I don't like the concept of pay-per-use since everything seems too expensive these days, but your vote is weclome.

Quote (kegman909650 @ Sat, 29 Nov 2008, 19:04)
Very well put together.
I can see why searching the archives could be helpful.
I voted yes.

Thank you, the polling currently stands at 9-4-2, placing the majority of votes with the 'ayes'. Bring clicks.
Go Back To Site Suggestions Archive Topic List
1234Next
Closed New Topic New Poll