d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > d2jsp > Site Suggestions > Site Suggestions Archive >
Poll > Automate Early Bump Control > Have Early Bump Cntrl Like Flood Control
Prev1789101136Next
Closed New Topic New Poll
Views: 7434Replies: 352Track Topic
  Guests cannot view or vote in polls. Please register or login.
Member
Posts: 5,183
Joined: Apr 8 2007
Gold: 2,155.09
#81
May 23 2008 10:13pm
I was going to vote Yes before I read that huge cool thing from Rew heart.gif smile.gif ! ^^ So I vote null ^.o smile.gif " I like the current system because it enables people to learn from their mistakes " ... So true. Couldn't say better ^.^

Quote (RewtheBrave @ Sat, May 24 2008, 12:05am)
If people follow the rules, this wouldn't be an issue, either. I'd sooner suggest advocacy of rule-following than automated enforcement. It pains me to see early bumps but at the same time I like the current system because it enables people to learn from their mistakes--and pay for egregious rule-breaking. Without the existing constraints, people might not learn in the more organic fashion. And that would be a shame, because the rest of the site works the way the trade forums work now (no automations on enforcements).

For me it's a matter of consistency and allowing people to make mistakes so that they can learn from them. I like the natural feel of how things work now, but the solid sense of what you've suggested is apparent to me. I'm a "NO" without adding a vote. I'd rather not tarnish the debate at this point.


Banned
Posts: 2,265
Joined: Jul 16 2006
Gold: Locked
#82
May 23 2008 10:35pm
i posted yes becouse the time and date of your post is safed in the mysql database anyways
you only need to add something like

Quote
if $date > $time+04:00 then
post()
endif


this wouldnt realy make the site slower and its no big deal

This post was edited by Cr4zYan on May 23 2008 10:35pm
Member
Posts: 19,377
Joined: Jul 10 2007
Gold: 4,678.60
#83
May 23 2008 10:46pm
i personally like the idea.
Member
Posts: 28,331
Joined: Jun 9 2007
Gold: 11,700.00
#84
May 23 2008 11:12pm
Quote (thor123422 @ Fri, 23 May 2008, 20:29)

I dont see why you would ask people not to post if they say no. You need positive and negative feedback to make this non biased.


i did: "Please post arguments if do not agree."

unfortunately the vast majority of those who voted no did not give a reason:

64:49 (of the 49, 37 did not reply at all & 7 of the remainder did not read the post properly)


Member
Posts: 28,331
Joined: Jun 9 2007
Gold: 11,700.00
#85
May 24 2008 06:23pm
same
Member
Posts: 28,331
Joined: Jun 9 2007
Gold: 11,700.00
#86
May 25 2008 06:24pm
65:49 (of the 49, 37 did not reply at all & 7 of the remainder did not read the post properly)
Member
Posts: 16,295
Joined: Jul 19 2005
Gold: 6.05
#87
May 25 2008 06:40pm
No, it's very simple like it is right now.
Member
Posts: 28,331
Joined: Jun 9 2007
Gold: 11,700.00
#88
May 26 2008 06:02pm
Quote (kebramar @ Mon, 26 May 2008, 00:40)
No, it's very simple like it is right now.


not really an argument against the suggestion but at least he said something
(can't see how automated control of some early bumps would complicate matters for him)

65:50 (of the 50, 37 did not reply at all & 7 of the remainder did not read the post properly)
Member
Posts: 4,303
Joined: Dec 14 2007
Gold: 0.00
#89
May 26 2008 07:34pm
naw id say no
Not really needed, easy enough to just bump it the "old fashin way"
Member
Posts: 5,372
Joined: Jul 15 2006
Gold: 2,800.00
#90
May 26 2008 07:54pm
not needed
Go Back To Site Suggestions Archive Topic List
Prev1789101136Next
Closed New Topic New Poll

© 2003-2026 d2jsp  Contact