still he same

I say yes


I dont see why you would ask people not to post if they say no. You need positive and negative feedback to make this non biased.

no imo too much bumping would make this site a mess

If you do flood control thing how do you determine if it's a bump or someone comenting back to another user?

Not like the noobs won't just find a way around it anyways.

same opinion

I vote yes

it's a waste for people to report in everytime ..........half the time they don't get closed after bein reported.......

I like this idea alot ....surpise alot of the mods inforce this issuse

well it could stop the thread maker from posting twice in a row within 4 hour intervals. Woiuldnt be greatly hard.

If people follow the rules, this wouldn't be an issue, either. I'd sooner suggest advocacy of rule-following than automated enforcement. It pains me to see early bumps but at the same time I like the current system because it enables people to learn from their mistakes--and pay for egregious rule-breaking. Without the existing constraints, people might not learn in the more organic fashion. And that would be a shame, because the rest of the site works the way the trade forums work now (no automations on enforcements).

For me it's a matter of consistency and allowing people to make mistakes so that they can learn from them. I like the natural feel of how things work now, but the solid sense of what you've suggested is apparent to me. I'm a "NO" without adding a vote. I'd rather not tarnish the debate at this point.

yes from me.