d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > d2jsp > Site Suggestions > Site Suggestions Archive >
Poll > New Warn Idea
Prev1345678Next
Closed New Topic New Poll
Views: 1580Replies: 75Track Topic
  Guests cannot view or vote in polls. Please register or login.
Member
Posts: 50,291
Joined: Feb 21 2004
Gold: 708.17
#41
Feb 17 2010 06:54pm
from what i seen.
the day they closed guild chats anyone with any % warn wasnt allowed to post. then blam closed

%warn= no df access
Member
Posts: 5,606
Joined: Aug 19 2009
Gold: 100.00
Warn: 40%
#42
Feb 17 2010 07:01pm
Quote (clifford @ Feb 16 2010 05:18pm)
10% - You will lose posting privileges in the Love Line.
30% - Your user blog rights and your ability to post youtube links are removed. You also may lose posting privileges in some specific forums.
50% - Your signature, avatar, profile, orb, photo gallery, and guild rights are removed.
70% - Your gold rights and private message rights are removed, as well as access to your warn logs.
100% - You posting rights are removed.
thats the system now.




make it so each warn will make you have certain access to use forum gold. a certain # a day or week/month. like an ATM machine( only withdraw soo much a day)

giving a limit on fg will maybe have ppl think before getting warns.
help the mod team out on giving warns all the time.
everyone uses fg.


lol no kid thats not the system now
Member
Posts: 50,291
Joined: Feb 21 2004
Gold: 708.17
#43
Feb 17 2010 07:09pm
Quote (Despear @ Feb 17 2010 08:01pm)
lol no kid thats not the system now


http://forums.d2jsp.org/topic.php?t=22361946&f=34

only link i see
Member
Posts: 48,198
Joined: Nov 10 2008
Gold: 95.00
#44
Feb 18 2010 07:37am
Quote (clifford @ Feb 16 2010 05:21pm)
some ppl get warns on purpose


and some warns arent on purpose

considered unjust by most

first meds need to stop being scared to hand out warns imo
if rules were enforced better, people would have higher warns

the reason why people get warns "on purpose" is cause they know theres a good chance they wont even get a warn for what theyre doing

idk how many spam topics, posts, disrespectful, racist, etc etc posts ive seen
been reported, and nothing done. prolly not even a verbal handed out

just my 2 cents

so no, get things together before trying to reprimand us further for the staff's laziness
Member
Posts: 50,291
Joined: Feb 21 2004
Gold: 708.17
#45
Feb 18 2010 02:53pm
Quote (Pimpin_Nation @ Feb 18 2010 08:37am)
and some warns arent on purpose

considered unjust by most

first meds need to stop being scared to hand out warns imo
if rules were enforced better, people would have higher warns

the reason why people get warns "on purpose" is cause they know theres a good chance they wont even get a warn for what theyre doing

idk how many spam topics, posts, disrespectful, racist, etc etc posts ive seen
been reported, and nothing done. prolly not even a verbal handed out

just my 2 cents

so no, get things together before trying to reprimand us further for the staff's laziness



i seen ppl get a warn for say spam. as soon as they come back from the 24hours they are spamming. and never stop, 30days later of spamming the warn gets removed.
warns dont mean nothing to ppl. they know they will get removed if no one reports them again.
it takes too much time to report someone for spam/early bumps
Member
Posts: 70,577
Joined: Dec 17 2005
Gold: 9,004.00
#46
Feb 18 2010 03:07pm
Quote (Pimpin_Nation @ 18 Feb 2010 15:37)
and some warns arent on purpose

considered unjust by most

first meds need to stop being scared to hand out warns imo
if rules were enforced better, people would have higher warns

the reason why people get warns "on purpose" is cause they know theres a good chance they wont even get a warn for what theyre doing

idk how many spam topics, posts, disrespectful, racist, etc etc posts ive seen
been reported, and nothing done. prolly not even a verbal handed out

just my 2 cents

so no, get things together before trying to reprimand us further for the staff's laziness


Meds are mediators, which means they can mediate trades.
They can't hand out warnings unless they have a moderator status (or maybe member++, hard to say).

and no, I don't think a change is needed.
Member
Posts: 17,196
Joined: Jan 6 2009
Gold: 8,211.50
#47
Feb 18 2010 03:10pm
Yes. I agree.
Member
Posts: 21,380
Joined: Dec 23 2007
Gold: 1.00
#48
Feb 18 2010 07:55pm
Quote (Rusted @ Feb 16 2010 06:20pm)
Things not related to trade shouldn't impact Trading

MOSFET


What about when people spam up the trading forums? If they're just spamming in trade forums then the spam affects the trading on the site.

So, they get 10% for early bumping or spamming they they'll think twice before doing it again.
Member
Posts: 512
Joined: Feb 9 2010
Gold: Locked
Trader: Scammer
#49
Feb 18 2010 08:44pm
dont like it
Member
Posts: 12,014
Joined: Apr 15 2009
Gold: 1,773.70
#50
Feb 18 2010 09:31pm
Quote (clifford @ Feb 16 2010 05:18pm)
10% - You will lose posting privileges in the Love Line.
30% - Your user blog rights and your ability to post youtube links are removed. You also may lose posting privileges in some specific forums.
50% - Your signature, avatar, profile, orb, photo gallery, and guild rights are removed.
70% - Your gold rights and private message rights are removed, as well as access to your warn logs.
100% - You posting rights are removed.
thats the system now.




make it so each warn will make you have certain access to use forum gold. a certain # a day or week/month. like an ATM machine( only withdraw soo much a day)

giving a limit on fg will maybe have ppl think before getting warns.
help the mod team out on giving warns all the time.
everyone uses fg.


Voted yes.
Would deter people who are serious about trading for flaming/harrasing others.
Though I would like to see something implimented about locked/scammer tags harrasing users in the trading forum. (completly irrelevant.)
Go Back To Site Suggestions Archive Topic List
Prev1345678Next
Closed New Topic New Poll

© 2003-2026 d2jsp  Contact