d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > d2jsp > Site Suggestions > Site Suggestions Archive >
Poll > How To Effectively Destroy The "multi" Forever > Let's All Clean This Place Up Right Now
Prev134567Next
Closed New Topic New Poll
  Guests cannot view or vote in polls. Please register or login.
Member
Posts: 5,272
Joined: Oct 27 2008
Gold: 63.10
Apr 29 2009 02:48am
Quote (sirkreik @ Wed, Apr 29 2009, 04:47am)
dude dont you understand ITS GOING TO HAPPEN ANYWAY... leave as is and just becareful


yeah i agree with this... use common sense, ignore the retardation, and stop giving them more alternatives...

they really arent that smart, bur every time you think up a way aroudn the rules and then speak up, you're making them smarter...
Member
Posts: 57,858
Joined: May 26 2008
Gold: 0.00
Apr 29 2009 02:49am
Quote (wence @ Wed, 29 Apr 2009, 04:44)
is it just me or does the bolded section sound like cultist mumbo-jumbo to anyone else?


I dont think anyone should look apon this thread and be bias about the topic just because of the guild or beliefs of another person. This thread isnt about Zeitgeists its about banning proxies.

This is definitely a thinker but im sure njag would beable to pull something off to accommodate everyone's needs. I mean hes working on jsp mobile.

So you never know.

This post was edited by Killermcknight76 on Apr 29 2009 02:49am
Member
Posts: 11,570
Joined: Nov 13 2007
Gold: 1,064.17
Apr 29 2009 02:51am
don't worry too much about the multis voting no. njag's final decision is what matters any way, he alone will decide if he wants to do this or not.
Member
Posts: 2,277
Joined: Aug 30 2008
Gold: 10.25
Apr 29 2009 02:55am
DOnt Care Dont care dont care my vote is no
Member
Posts: 378
Joined: Sep 18 2008
Gold: 275.10
Apr 29 2009 02:56am
Quote (nato_420 @ Wed, Apr 29 2009, 03:41am)
ty and its not a cult your just to ignorant to under stand its true meaning
multi sharing more than accounts worth of words?
yes


i said it was awesome, never said it was a cult.

and speaking of ignorant... >.>
Member
Posts: 57,858
Joined: May 26 2008
Gold: 0.00
Apr 29 2009 02:56am
Quote (presti @ Wed, 29 Apr 2009, 04:51)
don't worry too much about the multis voting no. njag's final decision is what matters any way, he alone will decide if he wants to do this or not.


You just had to talk shit huh? lol

yeah this is true we vote making it seem like a vote even matters but it doesnt.

This subject would be alot of work for njag so I doubt it in the long run he would do it but the voting process is nice seeing other ppls opinoins on the subject.

Itd be nice to get rid of multis/scammers but realistically this theory is 2 hard with alot of gaps in between. I voted yes because maybe it could happen but who knows.
Member
Posts: 800
Joined: Sep 5 2007
Gold: 0.25
Apr 29 2009 02:56am
Quote (wence @ Wed, 29 Apr 2009, 04:48)
yeah i agree with this... use common sense, ignore the retardation, and stop giving them more alternatives...

they really arent that smart, bur every time you think up a way aroudn the rules and then speak up, you're making them smarter...


fail... let me spell it out

Proxy server: sits between the network router and the Internet; talks to the Internet on behalf of a network’s resources, allowing real network addresses to be hidden

dont you think I cant spoof my ip multiple times with the 3 routers I have? I dont multi cause I dont have time but this will be a waste of time and resources

dont force the ppl that want to do this to have to get more aggressive... just like botting.. everytime blizz tries to stop it someone comes up with a new, better bot... its a non stop cycle...
Member
Posts: 11,570
Joined: Nov 13 2007
Gold: 1,064.17
Apr 29 2009 03:02am
Quote (Killermcknight76 @ Wed, Apr 29 2009, 03:56am)
You just had to talk shit huh? lol

yeah this is true we vote making it seem like a vote even matters but it doesnt.

This subject would be alot of work for njag so I doubt it in the long run he would do it but the voting process is nice seeing other ppls opinoins on the subject.

Itd be nice to get rid of multis/scammers but realistically this theory is 2 hard with alot of gaps in between. I voted yes because maybe it could happen but who knows.


i was just pointing out that any one can make multis and repeatedly vote for their choice, so i think the votes are just to show how many people are interested and are not so much an accurate reflection of the jsp community's opinions.

njag will see that a lot of people are voting here, and will prioritize this suggestion. then he will make his decision, but probably won't make it based on the vote counts because the multis can repeatedly vote no.
Banned
Posts: 8,039
Joined: Jun 24 2004
Gold: 33.01
Warn: 50%
Apr 29 2009 03:02am
this thread shouldn't just be locked, it should be deleted.
for being incredibly fucking dumb
Member
Posts: 57,889
Joined: May 23 2007
Gold: 0.00
Apr 29 2009 03:03am
Quote (Zumber @ Wed, 29 Apr 2009, 17:38)
Look at it this way:
1. If they call their ISP enough, the ISP will have to investigate. And its a waste of time and money on the Multi's fault.
2. People do use proxy's for legitimate reasons. Create a special tag on the site for it so you can post and trade.
3. Zeitgeist is pretty awesome.


1. investigate what? you can call your ip & request an ip change. it's perfectly legal.
2. no need more tags & as other users mentioned there are 10000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 proxy addresses
3. no, it is #1 fucking fail guild & i am utterly disappointed it was allowed to move into the donor forums (where instead of in user blogs spewing fucking retarded cult agendas;i will now have to listen to the pointless rantings in the donor forums as well)

Quote (clan_iraq @ Wed, 29 Apr 2009, 18:02)
this thread shouldn't just be locked, it should be deleted.
for being incredibly fucking dumb


agreed :cheerS:

This post was edited by Greapper on Apr 29 2009 03:06am
Go Back To Site Suggestions Archive Topic List
Prev134567Next
Closed New Topic New Poll