Mod Team Rating? - Topic

Member

Posts: 93,326

Joined: Jan 24 2009

Gold: Locked

Jun 30 2010 07:13am

Quote (AspenSniper @ 30 Jun 2010 07:49)

No thanks. Everyone on the mod team is there for a reason, if they slacked or weren't good moderators I don't think they'd be there. I wouldn't want a rating system as a popularity contest. Not to mention, some do extremely good work in places you might not be active in, and they wouldn't be seen as often despite being fantastic at what they do. I wouldn't want to judge someone based on that when it's impossible to know the amount of work the mod team really does.

No way, it's wayyy too subjective and based on personal opinion.

I agree on this.

Magisk

Member

Posts: 83,193

Joined: Nov 2 2007

Gold: 115,047.00

#32

Jun 30 2010 07:13am

No ofc not, very bad idea + easy way to rage at mod team.

skrewzrloose

Member

Posts: 8,798

Joined: Jun 23 2007

Gold: 0.01

#33

Jun 30 2010 07:15am

everyone says its too easy to rage and abuse

but look at the christian forum
go try abusing that and see if you dont get some sunlight

RatM

Retired Moderator

Posts: 38,050

Joined: Dec 25 2007

Gold: 37,715.00

Trader: Trusted

#34

Jun 30 2010 07:19am

I nulled.

I think it will be cool to have because some mods are a word I'm not going to say. But I highly doubt it will ever happen + I don't think it will be effective because they all stick up for each other of course so they will pretty much ignore any bad criticism just like pm's.

hedonism

Member

Posts: 33,156

Joined: Apr 8 2006

Gold: 737.50

#35

Jun 30 2010 07:20am

We have plenty of internal ways to ensure quality. If you have an issue with a particular moderator PM _Mork_, and yes that is his responsibility.

Tears

Member

Posts: 35,522

Joined: Jul 30 2006

Gold: 1,650.00

Trader: Trusted

#36

Jun 30 2010 07:21am

Quote (Razzattack @ Jun 30 2010 08:09am)

For those users saying it would be abused, I believe this would be untrue, as warns are handed out anonymously. For this reason, I don't really see how else it could be abused, either a mod helps out and gets a plus, or they don't and they get a negative.

As much as the mods don't want to admit it (inb4 10%), I don't think some mods are as helpful as others, with a negative feedback rating this would encourage those mods to try harder and perform their job here to a more adequate standard. I'm not calling out mods in particular here, I'm just speaking generally, so don't go and rage at me for bias / disrespect, ty

I've found Mork to be a very helpful mod (one of the best), but there's little sense in forwarding "this mod was unhelpful" cases to him, is there? What is he supposed to do, check each and every individual case? Punish how, if at all?

This suggestion provides a solution... I believe this is a brilliant idea, personally, and although I fear it won't be passed, it is very interesting and I truely hope it is accepted

mods / and any TT plus is helpful, thats how they got the tag
its just sometimes of the day or somethings they cant help with
i know many ppl who check on jsp on there phone and cant reply to pms
there busy and get alot of pms, there human just like you
and take care of you and everyone else when they can

imo not needed
if u have a problem with a TT or higher pm _Mork_
remember u always see the negatives
u hardly see the positives

This post was edited by Tears on Jun 30 2010 07:21am

Valorcide

Member

Posts: 31,184

Joined: Apr 29 2008

Gold: 511.10

#37

Jun 30 2010 08:26am

Ok, now that some moderators/mediators/etc. have weighed in, I have my view:

It can be run by an active member, but each vote should have at least 120 characters of reviewing the user at hand, and every rating cast should be reviewed by whoever runs it so someone doesnt just go 0/5 stars "hedonism sucks balls" (i used the last mod to post in here.. no offense hedonism

) And instead only allow people who took the time to share WHY they rated the member as they did. I'm sure some of these guys actually care that they're not appearing like an asshole on here and are viewed in a favorable light, but they also know that probably 80% of the votes would be negative, whether its from someone they marked with a scammer tag, got a warn from, etc. That's not to say that the list runner would filter out all the bad ones...just the votes that seem completely biased out of anger or something, without really explaining why they feel that way.

I realize this is a tl;dr but I would like a little feedback.

Grimdayz

Member

Posts: 23,396

Joined: Aug 8 2006

Gold: 559.34

#38

Jun 30 2010 10:44am

Quote (Razzattack @ Jun 30 2010 06:09am)

Thanks! If it was like the photo rating system... there would be no probs. ONE vote per ONE member for every ONE mod.. simple.

Quote (hedonism @ Jun 30 2010 06:20am)

We have plenty of internal ways to ensure quality. If you have an issue with a particular moderator PM _Mork_, and yes that is his responsibility.

this needs to be more known by the public users.. Couldnt monnk run the forum.. maybe make his life easyer..

For the mods who are agisnt this... and no effence Tears.. I pm'd you about some spam and nothing was done.. wasnt untill 4 hours later i found a mod that was willing to do somthing.. TY kuk agian. ( i understand people have lives ect.. and cant always jump at peoples needs... this isnt the first time is my point)

I understand you was probly busy.. as from what i know ur a better mod here on jsp.. but its that sorta thing.. that kuk should get some sorta props for.. i woudln t run out and spam you guys all bad for no repsonding to my pm;s .. simply want a place to reward the good mods like kuk who try harder then most.
And the mods who openly go outa their way to screw with people.. get bad ratings.

Just think this would help keep everyone in check.

A star rating even.. liket he photo section.. WOULD BE PERFECT. just my thoughts.

This post was edited by Grimdayz on Jun 30 2010 10:47am

Go Back To Site Suggestions Archive Topic List