the point is in the 1-4 in the initial post and in post 23 of this thread. I'm not suggesting only a tag.

I'm suggesting specific consequences for that tag that spammers would not want..

... hence THEY are voting NO... pretty obvious, aint it...?

This post was edited by FePhoenix on Dec 22 2009 05:14pm

Will never happen paul's sites popularity on the net thrives on these waste less post just another notch in the belt

stop trolling

Yeah if someone votes no, he must be a spammer.

Vouch.

Anyway, for an almost 50 years old, you're a bit too concerned about spam on a gamingforum filled with teenagers.

goodluck though.

perhaps. however, pauls pocket thrives on those who trade here (and buy fg to do it). these people have no interest in spam.


perhaps. maybe im just tired of weeding through spam to find the material sought. maybe im tired of seeing friends' threads closed for the little bastards spamming. maybe these kids need to have their computer time restricted and monitored. w/e. this, or some other appropriate, severe and effective measure, is needed.

This post was edited by FePhoenix on Dec 22 2009 05:13pm

No thanks.

notice something here? most (not all) of those who are saying no without any thinking behind it (or being rude) have 20+ posts per day.
spammers unite!

and person who made this topic: Posts: 3,555 (1.9 per day), why?

maybe someone with 20+ ppd as u said should suggest tag like 'newb' for you?

made my day : D

No, would be totally pointless. Mediator/Scammer/Trusted all have a reason.

This would increase the amount of spam and multies.

No thanks.