d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > d2jsp > Site Suggestions > Site Suggestions Archive >
Poll > Scammer Accusations
Prev12345Next
Closed New Topic New Poll
  Guests cannot view or vote in polls. Please register or login.
Member
Posts: 14,218
Joined: May 14 2008
Gold: 0.85
Jan 26 2009 10:46am
[X] Yes
But how u can make this to post only who got scammed?
i need to know cuzz no one can know if u got scammed -.- thats why u need proofs
Member
Posts: 21,200
Joined: Jul 24 2008
Gold: 41,780.00
Jan 26 2009 04:54pm
Quote (Konqk @ Mon, Jan 26 2009, 11:46am)
[X] Yes
But how u can make this to post only who got scammed?
i need to know cuzz no one can know if u got scammed -.- thats why u need proofs


No, you can post that you got scammed there with all your proof.

This is just to stop all the rands who spam everyones topics saying, oh vouch this guy hes legit blah blah.
Member
Posts: 21,200
Joined: Jul 24 2008
Gold: 41,780.00
Jan 27 2009 07:58pm
up
Member
Posts: 21,200
Joined: Jul 24 2008
Gold: 41,780.00
Jan 30 2009 03:48pm
24 hours
Member
Posts: 55,374
Joined: Mar 6 2006
Gold: 220.48
Jan 30 2009 03:51pm
Quote (Sabine @ Sun, Jan 25 2009, 06:24pm)
would be awsome but im pretty sure its impossible to code something like this
to many variables:
topicreator / accused /approved helper /mediator +
all others cannot post


QFT. Voted yes, but all these factors would make it next to impossible to impliment.
There's only one real way to stop spam, and we all know what that is. =D
Member
Posts: 10,352
Joined: Aug 5 2007
Gold: 9,426.00
Jan 30 2009 03:54pm
if this happens, wudnt the perosn that gets accused have no voice of saying?
Member
Posts: 21,200
Joined: Jul 24 2008
Gold: 41,780.00
Jan 30 2009 04:03pm
Quote (Yimyo @ Fri, Jan 30 2009, 04:54pm)
if this happens, wudnt the perosn that gets accused have no voice of saying?


Read along the post. Just the page before this we were discussing.

Quote (Arsenic_Touch @ Fri, Jan 30 2009, 04:51pm)
QFT. Voted yes, but all these factors would make it next to impossible to impliment.
There's only one real way to stop spam, and we all know what that is. =D


Hahaha, the crai more noob button ofc!

Imo some people people dont care about 10%s...Some of them actually ask for warns to help quit etc etc...
Member
Posts: 21,200
Joined: Jul 24 2008
Gold: 41,780.00
Jan 31 2009 12:19pm
up

The person being accused will have there jsp link here so that the scammer acc can identify him and allow him to post there to defend himself



This post was edited by JeremyLepage on Jan 31 2009 12:24pm
Member
Posts: 15,073
Joined: Dec 5 2008
Gold: 30,106.30
Jan 31 2009 12:42pm
Quote (Anarkin @ Mon, 26 Jan 2009, 03:29)
And what about, if the poster didn't mention the other user in the Topic title / Description? :|

Hard to implement, will not happen, imo.

But ofc would be nice, just like hundreds of other ideas. ^^


This could be fixed if ppl could chose (with a pulldown menu) while creating a topic if they wanted to make a special s/a thread or a normal thread!

If they open a normal thread the s/a will get ignored and be moved right into the archive!

If he decides to open a s/a thread - he gets like a new textbox field besides the topic title / topic description with "username" where he has to enter the correct user name

that he wishes to file in the report about!

That way an algorithm could always check once a thread is moved to s/a forum or created there wether he can read out that textbox or not and with that he can automatically set the topic rights!

Ppl have to be forced to make such threads with all the rules and requirenments requested - s/a threads mustnt be some kinda joke that ppl can create out of a mood!

I vote yes for the idea to manage all the spamming in s/a threads!

This post was edited by n00bcount on Jan 31 2009 12:43pm
Member
Posts: 21,200
Joined: Jul 24 2008
Gold: 41,780.00
Feb 1 2009 05:44pm
up
Go Back To Site Suggestions Archive Topic List
Prev12345Next
Closed New Topic New Poll