The last time this was suggested many users disagreed, a few who said "yes" in this thread. You must be popular.

Anyways, a lot of people disliked this idea because there are already consequences as you ascend the warning scale, some believe that users will be tempted to make even more multiple accounts instead of simply waiting, and because people aren't always warned for spamming directly / sometimes completely different reasons. I don't really like this idea, because I believe that when a user with 50% makes multiple inappropriate spam topics then you're just increasing the interval of which the threads are made, which some could argue just makes the situation worse. Though it might give more time for a d2jsp staff member to "control the situation" , they usually have more important matters to deal with for a while anyway.

Just wondering, why would you make this suggestion again after the topic was closed?
Sorry if I misinterpreted this suggestion as exactly the same as the last one.

This post was edited by Linux on Jul 26 2008 11:34pm

Oh my god yes. YES from me. Please do this.

Suggest already, i would even support increase the delay at 10%!

Still yes

I suggested it.

@Linux: I repost it because Njaguar was thinking it was useless but now since Gary made the coding it will be easy to put it here and did you see the mass spam and early bump in the trading ground??
75% of the post in the trading ground have spam in it and early bump, if we had this spammer wont be able to post as fast as now and the mod team will have more time for handle the spam.

yea. This would help out a lot.

I very rarely see any users receive warnings for early bumping or one spam topic. So, this probably wouldn't affect the general trading community at all, as the majority have less than 30%. As I said before, the staff is usually too late and the spam topic is closed by the automatic 60+ post closing (which is a very nice add). Lastly, if njaguar said it was completely useless and obviously some people don't like this suggestion, then I don't really understand how it already existing would affect the chance of it being implemented. I might be wrong but I don't think this would be a very time-consuming / complicated add.

I know spammer and early bumper don't get warn so easy but if they can post less it will give time to the mod team.
This is what I think.

i like the idea
spammers are annoying
yes

i say 40 seconds at 30%
and 50 seconds at 40%

This post was edited by Barbiee on Jul 27 2008 06:01pm

Yup, 100% agree.

Good idea, I'd like to see this added.