160:134 (of the 134, 89 did not reply at all & 12 of the remainder did not read the post properly - makes it 160:33 really )

I said yes, but i think a couple should be allowed. Answering an important question to a certain item you might be selling is pretty legit i think, might be too late to edit. I just want the every 2 min bumpers gone

it is fully legal to answer a question and this suggestion does not prevent posting after someone else has posted
(even if it is spam, that cannot be determined automatically but needs human intelligence)

AND

162:135 (of the 135, 90 did not reply at all & 12 of the remainder did not read the post properly - makes it 162:33 really )

Who cares if someone doesnt post a reason, it still counts as a no, and since your doing it that way i wish i did vote no.

votes yes anyway

i know, just trying to tease all those compulsive early bumpers
and i doubt that the exact vote anyhow counts,
it's really the matter if there is some support and the admin likes it

165:137 (of the 137, 92 did not reply at all & 12 of the remainder did not read the post properly - makes it 165:33 really

167:137 (of the 137, 92 did not reply at all & 12 of the remainder did not read the post properly - makes it 167:33 really )

169:138 (of the 138, 93 did not reply at all & 12 of the remainder did not read the post properly - makes it 169:33 really )

every one who voted no is an early bumper~~

yes from me but guess wont happen

I admire njaguar's forum etiquette policies and their enforcement. That is all. totally not a sarcastic blink

This post was edited by llamaoo7 on Jul 27 2008 07:30pm

170:144 (of the 144, 99 did not reply at all & 12 of the remainder did not read the post properly - makes it 170:33 really )

This post was edited by brmv on Jul 29 2008 05:05pm