d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > d2jsp > Site Suggestions > Site Suggestions Archive >
Poll > Automate Early Bump Control > Have Early Bump Cntrl Like Flood Control
Prev1202122232436Next
Closed New Topic New Poll
Views: 7429Replies: 352Track Topic
  Guests cannot view or vote in polls. Please register or login.
Member
Posts: 28,331
Joined: Jun 9 2007
Gold: 11,700.00
#211
Jul 14 2008 01:57am
145:127 (of the 127, 84 did not reply at all & 12 of the remainder did not read the post properly - makes it 145:31 really ohmy.gif)

Member
Posts: 16,409
Joined: Jun 7 2007
Gold: 15,600.00
#212
Jul 14 2008 02:00am
Quote (Linux @ Mon, May 5 2008, 06:03am)
I'm pretty sure I've seen this suggested before. Yes for now, but I would like to see an argument that points out a serious flaw.


i'm with Linux, i think it's a good idea but i'm sure there are some flaws or arguments which i would like to hear smile.gif

This post was edited by WoEProtectoR on Jul 14 2008 02:00am
Banned
Posts: 15,000
Joined: Oct 31 2007
Gold: Locked
Trader: Scammer
Warn: 10%
#213
Jul 14 2008 05:53am
yes
Member
Posts: 28,331
Joined: Jun 9 2007
Gold: 11,700.00
#214
Jul 15 2008 03:14pm
150:128 (of the 128, 85 did not reply at all & 12 of the remainder did not read the post properly - makes it 150:31 really ohmy.gif)
Member
Posts: 28,331
Joined: Jun 9 2007
Gold: 11,700.00
#215
Jul 17 2008 05:57pm
152:129 (of the 129, 86 did not reply at all & 12 of the remainder did not read the post properly - makes it 152:31 really ohmy.gif)
Member
Posts: 16,396
Joined: Oct 15 2006
Gold: 7.00
#216
Jul 17 2008 06:25pm
Quote (brmv @ Sun, May 4 2008, 08:14am)
When the thread creator posts/bumps, the Next Bump time is shown. It should be easy to determine if the last post was by the thread creator.
Rather then allowing to post before the bump time has expired the user should be send to a screen similar to flood control, stating that an illegal bump is attempted. (Perhaps even have a short time delay)
This should reduce the number of early bumps (hopefully) significantly and improve trading for those who follow the rules.

Please post arguments if do not agree.


Simple No.
Because,
If you think about it, if you post something, two hours later, you remember something else to post on it too, and you don't want to forget, and you can't edit your post, you would either have to repost, or wait a few hours to do it.
Example :
Selling Hoz! 187 ed

then no one posts, and in an hour and 30 mins, you remember, oh shit! i didn't put that it was up'd! or something like that, but no!
Member
Posts: 28,331
Joined: Jun 9 2007
Gold: 11,700.00
#217
Jul 17 2008 10:50pm
Quote (DiabloKiller12 @ Fri, 18 Jul 2008, 00:25)
Simple No.
Because,
If you think about it, if you post something, two hours later, you remember something else to post on it too, and you don't want to forget, and you can't edit your post, you would either have to repost, or wait a few hours to do it.
Example :
Selling Hoz! 187 ed
then no one posts, and in an hour and 30 mins, you remember, oh shit! i didn't put that it was up'd! or something like that, but no!


what you are describing is clearly against the rules - i would recommend to keep a notepad handy

154:132 (of the 132, 88 did not reply at all & 12 of the remainder did not read the post properly - makes it 154:32 really ohmy.gif)
Member
Posts: 3,140
Joined: Jun 11 2008
Gold: 1,000.00
#218
Jul 18 2008 08:21am
Quote (paperbackslave @ Tue, Jul 8 2008, 01:02pm)
ok, i went with no, after reading 10 of the 20 pages, but didnt see my reason there,so
reason is:
Instances such as recent ladder reset have created copious trade threads. Several instances have occured where the moment I post my items(s) for trade, there are so many posts at the same time (admittedly some of these are likely early bumps biggrin.gif), that noone has a chance to even see my post - it is simply gone before I get back to the main trading screen.
Now, obviously, I have no life, but I certainly dont want to wait around for 4 hours so I can bump my thread, only to be swamped again. I consider myself to be an honset rule follower, but I will admit to early bumps in this instance, simply to get my item seen.


Ok, after thinking on this more, I think one solution may be to simply add a few more filters, say set items and uniques. Also, if people didnt have to pay for a detailed search, there would not be as many posts to clog the boards.
But I still say no. Warns should be sufficient, and if the above were implemented, I think it would help the problem.
Member
Posts: 28,331
Joined: Jun 9 2007
Gold: 11,700.00
#219
Jul 19 2008 03:16pm
Quote (paperbackslave @ Fri, 18 Jul 2008, 14:21)
Ok, after thinking on this more, I think one solution may be to simply add a few more filters, say set items and uniques. Also, if people didnt have to pay for a detailed search, there would not be as many posts to clog the boards.
But I still say no. Warns should be sufficient, and if the above were implemented, I think it would help the problem.


thank you for a detailed comment and while i agree tat mode filters might help, it will take some time to get the right set of filters if one can really cover with filters all the various cases (or it might need the restructuring of posts), so i still tink might suggestion would help

157:133 (of the 133, 88 did not reply at all & 12 of the remainder did not read the post properly - makes it 157:33 really ohmy.gif)
Member
Posts: 41,915
Joined: Apr 15 2006
Gold: 3,375.33
Trader: Trusted
#220
Jul 19 2008 03:20pm
this sounds good in some ways but useless in other ways..

i will vote yes. but maybe to make it seem better and better understood to maybe take some screenies and add to it to show us how it would work ect.
Go Back To Site Suggestions Archive Topic List
Prev1202122232436Next
Closed New Topic New Poll

© 2003-2026 d2jsp  Contact