Quote (Furthur @ Jan 29 2012 11:04pm)

And why is that? I agree that a rating system isn't perfect, but no rating system is perfect. How could it possibly be worse than the user-created systems currently in place?

Quote (Casey @ Jan 29 2012 10:19pm)

I think......such a system could potentially be *ahem* abused on here.

/e and this is JSP, not a playground - who's going to manage the code and logistics of such a system?

Quote (Furthur @ Jan 29 2012 11:24pm)

The coding of a rating system could be done by a monkey who had taken a 2 hours night course at a community college.

Quote (Casey @ Jan 29 2012 10:47pm)

So you want to punish people who ignore a deal. Right.

Ignoring or breaking off communication from something means:

1. They are not interested or don't care

2. The terms given were not good enough

Punishing or giving a "tag" to someone who doesn't respond to a trade is pretty stupid. I imagine you're just frustrated at one particular person.

Quote (Casey @ Jan 29 2012 10:26pm)

......and the enforcement and logistics of it?

you think tons of d2jsp staff are needed for scammer accusastions?

good luck with a moronic system of "he said i said"

Quote (Furthur @ Jan 29 2012 11:28pm)

The system I suggested wouldn't require any enforcement. <<

Quote (Casey @ Jan 29 2012 11:29pm)

*facepalm*

goodbye sir

Quote (RUSSiABANK @ Jan 29 2012 11:14pm)

in my opinion, i think there are quite a few grey areas between "not-rated" and "trusted"

But i guess that's where non-accurate indicators such as date, post count, and fg come in lol.

Quote (Casey @ Jan 29 2012 10:29pm)

*facepalm*

goodbye sir