no over 90% of the site users are to imature

This.
And thats presuming users would be legitimate with their voting, which is really unlikely

well it could get to b a bad thing but it would have its up sides also make it so you can only vote once also if the mutis where cracked down on this would not b a big prob at all

This post was edited by Neoblack on Jun 30 2010 01:43am

What you dont understand is mods get so many violations reported to them both via pms and the report button they cant possibly take care of all of them, their only human. If you dont believe take a look at General Chat, User Blogs, and any d2 trading realm and see how many spam/illegal topics there are and thats only 3 out of 75+ forums on this site. Theres not even 75 moderators (remember only M++ have the power to do anything about these violations) currently on the team so if you think that they are going to be able to get every "+1" topic made then your crazy they need to handle more important violations first before they can get to the little ones.

Voted No



I agree 100% dylan

This post was edited by ImCam on Jun 30 2010 01:49am

It is just a game but imature or not.. they not to imature to spend money.. shouldnt they have a little say in how thier money is being managed.



kinda like this, one vote.. semi like the photo rating system lol.. ironicly. It would of course need to be looked at very closly.. and some things would need to be taking into account..


Also, I feel as a general most mods are good hearted and would in no way recive bad markings.. unless somone truly felt they where doing nothing..

it doesnt show who warns you.. and anyone who goes through and posts in every mods whatever somthing bad.. then would obivously be removed.. and move on.

if somone brings forth legit claims of a mod failing at their job.. then should be able to have someplace to express them safly.. without fearing warns/bans for "false accusations".

My ideas have sorta changed thoughout this topic though.. i understand the maturity level.. but we are talking about a site where people have a $ value of sorts.. if they can be reasponsable enough to manage then.. weather good or bad.. im sure they could manage a simply mod rating system. It wouldnt be hard to see whos just flaming and whos got legit cases that should be looked at..


Like seeing both sides though.. hope to get a little outa the spectrum of only.. jsp is not mature enough for this.... maybe another side i or the oppistion havnt brought up?

We got someone who is already rating our job, ofc your not aware of what we are doing and it happens that we forget to answer but we took the proper actions.

I find it useless and a way to rage against the Mod Team.

No
Doe.snt matter.
Wont ever happen.



Ps: I mean that it wont be constructive but just destructive.

This post was edited by ~Devil~ on Jun 30 2010 02:03am

i guess i see this side also.. im assuming by got somone you mean paul. But really what does he see.. does he review all the warns/ closed topic ect, as far as most are understanding the anwser is no.. and then if and when somone has a problem you can search up and down for somone to speak to and will find nothing.

Maybe not a topic or rating sytem as most seem to oppose any sort of negatives towards mods.... but maybe just a place not in S/A or locked sections to post and ask other mods if what one mod did was just.. or a link sumplace that simple to find to the guy that was posted up the monk guy.. who i was told handled such cases...


Example-
i understand you feel like your being watched and yes i have no idea of the behind the seens.. but i also know i had to pm 4 mods untill i found one who would do somthing about spam in a higher end FT topic i have... 4 mods and now kokukola fianly came to my savior and took care of it for me. The other mods i pm;d first and waited a long time.. while they where active couple hours on and off.. so i moved on and tried to find sum1 to deal with the problem.. like i said 4 mods later i found kuk a mod to take care of the propblem.. that to me doesnt seem right.. id like to props kuk for doing a great job(noplace i can do that).. but the other mods that still have not returned a single pm(yes they may now know its taking care of) but at the time they didnt(its been 6 hours or so).. it shouldnt have taking them 1-2 hours to respond to spam.. just my opinion.. this is the sorta case that i feel should be looked at. and have a place to be posted where i dont feel im going to be warned/ suspended for saying hey i think this mods slacking.
~i understand that mods are busy they have a lot to do.. and petty spam.. cough.. is hard to fit in. But it shouldnt have taking the report button(witch just gets my own topics closed) and 4 mods to get a little spam taken care of. ~



Off to bed for now.. looking forward to catching up in the AM.

( new idea.. A place to express freely if you feel a mod or whatever has done you wrong, or not done their job... yea i could see it being a big spam thread, but put filters like trade forums have,, idk i think im on to somthing but maybe.



Agian im hoping not to make anyone mad.. im not trying to get another warn.. just ideas im posting.

This post was edited by Grimdayz on Jun 30 2010 02:19am

I totaly agree with this one.

No random members would give mods a bad rate because they got a warn or there spam topics got closed or they got a pm saying there sig was to big (you get the idea)

For those users saying it would be abused, I believe this would be untrue, as warns are handed out anonymously. For this reason, I don't really see how else it could be abused, either a mod helps out and gets a plus, or they don't and they get a negative.

As much as the mods don't want to admit it (inb4 10%), I don't think some mods are as helpful as others, with a negative feedback rating this would encourage those mods to try harder and perform their job here to a more adequate standard. I'm not calling out mods in particular here, I'm just speaking generally, so don't go and rage at me for bias / disrespect, ty

I've found Mork to be a very helpful mod (one of the best), but there's little sense in forwarding "this mod was unhelpful" cases to him, is there? What is he supposed to do, check each and every individual case? Punish how, if at all?

This suggestion provides a solution... I believe this is a brilliant idea, personally, and although I fear it won't be passed, it is very interesting and I truely hope it is accepted

This post was edited by Razzattack on Jun 30 2010 07:12am