Quote (tric-isHUGE @ Mar 11 2010 08:27am)

I see the necessity of enforcing some higher standards on such a sub forum, but all you're doing is asking for more multis.  And with multis come more spam and flaming.  You will just be back trying to fix the subforum in a few weeks if you don't relax the rules a little bit. 

A decent compromise is 10%.  I post there regularly with what I consider decent posts and I've made a silly mistake and received a 10% warn.  I've received PMs about signatures being too large or having too much text.  Should I really be gone for a month for such a silly infraction?  Nah. 

I can't help but think that this will be a detriment to the sub forum, and you might find that out a little too late.




He just wants a "trusted" tag.

Quote (kamahl19 @ Mar 11 2010 08:32am)

That much is clear, and to be honest it is kind of pathetic.

10% is a good compromise, I think, but I felt 20% did a very good job at deterring trolls/spammers/etc.

Quote (thundercock @ Mar 11 2010 08:32am)

You are correct.  I already see over ten multis on the forum.

Quote (kamahl19 @ Mar 11 2010 08:34am)

I don't understand why people make multis, it is a clear violation of the site's policies and a disgrace to this fine site.

Quote (thundercock @ Mar 11 2010 08:37am)

I completely agree.  However, rules like these promote multis.  Anyway, I find it funny that most of the people who voted for "no warns allowed" have never stepped a foot into PaRD.