d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > d2jsp > Site Suggestions > Site Suggestions Archive >
Poll > Spammer Tag
Prev12345Next
Closed New Topic New Poll
  Guests cannot view or vote in polls. Please register or login.
Banned
Posts: 13,177
Joined: Jan 10 2009
Gold: 243.00
Dec 22 2009 04:01pm
Thats way to useless, im sorry that will not happen.
Member
Posts: 59,835
Joined: Mar 6 2008
Gold: 535.01
Dec 22 2009 04:01pm
I don't think this is good idea as for the tag and all that non-sence

But maybe when people make spam threads say in like uswest trading or any trade ground.

If they do it twice, it should be 10% warn + 12 or 24 hour suspension maybe.

Instead of letting them do like 10+ giving them a warning thn like 4+ more then ban.

but thats my opinion.


This post was edited by Master10 on Dec 22 2009 04:02pm
Member
Posts: 4,738
Joined: Nov 1 2004
Gold: 626.23
Dec 22 2009 04:08pm
Quote (Master10 @ 22 Dec 2009 17:01)
I don't think this is good idea as for the tag and all that non-sence

But maybe when people make spam threads say in like uswest trading or any trade ground.

If they do it twice, it should be 10% warn + 12 or 24 hour suspension maybe.

Instead of letting them do like 10+ giving them a warning thn like 4+ more then ban.

but thats my opinion.


and we're back to needing a mod team that actually does mod...
i like the above. make it mandatory... a certain level of spamming is a mandatory warn...
but that still falls on the mod team doing so.

minor addition to my original suggestion:
Know that little list of checkboxes that you have when you start a thread? add this one:

[ ] Permit Spammers to post in this thread.
(defaulted non-checked, like all the others)

Add that, the "glory" of being so tagged vanishes.
Member
Posts: 15,651
Joined: Jun 11 2007
Gold: 150.00
Warn: 10%
Dec 22 2009 04:13pm
I agree, only people that would dislike this are non-stop spammers and flamers. This suggestion would clear up the forums nicely.
Member
Posts: 59,835
Joined: Mar 6 2008
Gold: 535.01
Dec 22 2009 04:13pm
Quote (FePhoenix @ Dec 22 2009 03:08pm)
and we're back to needing a mod team that actually does mod...
i like the above. make it mandatory... a certain level of spamming is a mandatory warn...
but that still falls on the mod team doing so.

minor addition to my original suggestion:
Know that little list of checkboxes that you have when you start a thread? add this one:

[ ] Permit Spammers to post in this thread.
(defaulted non-checked, like all the others)

Add that, the "glory" of being so tagged vanishes.


Yes, But I still don't see this happening. But who knows.
Banned
Posts: 21,394
Joined: Mar 16 2006
Gold: Locked
Trader: Scammer
Warn: 50%
Dec 22 2009 04:14pm
No. Just no.

This post was edited by danifilth on Dec 22 2009 04:17pm
Member
Posts: 70,577
Joined: Dec 17 2005
Gold: 9,004.00
Dec 22 2009 04:23pm
Quote (FePhoenix @ 22 Dec 2009 23:58)
Agreed. When can we get THAT?


When they start getting paid.

Voting no, although I wouldn't mind having a spammer tag as it means absolutely nothing.
Anyone can tell by the postcount (yes mine for example is huge) if the person spams.

A scammer tag has an actual meaning as people know not to trade with that person, but what does a spammer tag do? nothing.
Member
Posts: 4,738
Joined: Nov 1 2004
Gold: 626.23
Dec 22 2009 04:48pm
Quote (HardyTarget @ 22 Dec 2009 17:23)
When they start getting paid.

Voting no, although I wouldn't mind having a spammer tag as it means absolutely nothing.
Anyone can tell by the postcount (yes mine for example is huge) if the person spams.

A scammer tag has an actual meaning as people know not to trade with that person, but what does a spammer tag do? nothing.


agreed on the paid part. kinda a thankless job. if they not willing or able, then appoint others that are...

another that didnt actually read, or didnt understand if he did. if all of the above happened, a spammer tag is something they would NOT want.

This post was edited by FePhoenix on Dec 22 2009 04:49pm
Member
Posts: 70,577
Joined: Dec 17 2005
Gold: 9,004.00
Dec 22 2009 04:53pm
Quote (FePhoenix @ 23 Dec 2009 00:48)
agreed on the paid part.  kinda a thankless job.  if they not willing or able, then appoint others that are...

another that didnt actually read, or didnt understand if he did.  if all of the above happened, a spammer tag is something they would NOT want.


I read and understood what you posted, but you apparently don't understand that there's no reason for such tag.
What would be the point of it? Why does a spammer need a tag visible showing that he spams? What does it help?

Spammers do get warned, suspended, banned eventually if they continue, you are only suggesting that there would be a tag added to that.

Also, that would've happened long time ago if it was to happen.
Member
Posts: 13,343
Joined: Aug 10 2008
Gold: Locked
Trader: Scammer
Warn: 20%
Dec 22 2009 04:55pm
No.
Go Back To Site Suggestions Archive Topic List
Prev12345Next
Closed New Topic New Poll