Infinite Edits In Non Trade Forums - Topic

Member

Posts: 26,620

Joined: Jul 3 2006

Gold: 7,798.12

Mar 20 2009 07:10pm

I think it's fine with the way it is now. voted no.

MAYBE, giving a little longer than 30 minutes to edit...but that's just a maybe.

Rapture

Member

Posts: 66,644

Joined: Oct 8 2005

Gold: 7,830.00

#22

Mar 21 2009 04:46pm

Quote (Markro @ Fri, Mar 20 2009, 03:26pm)
longer? no. infinite? definitely not.

Do not want.
Quote (Brainwashed @ Fri, Mar 20 2009, 09:10pm)
I think it's fine with the way it is now. voted no.

MAYBE, giving a little longer than 30 minutes to edit...but that's just a maybe.

I dont think it'd be of any use if it was just longer. I also dont see any use in it being timed.

BikiniGirl

Member

Posts: 13,214

Joined: Dec 1 2008

Gold: 0.01

#23

Mar 21 2009 05:24pm

Quote (Titch @ Sat, Mar 14 2009, 03:36pm)

might result in mass confusion on conversations...
and means you ould change what youre saying, making it look like the other guy is always in the wrong if you reprt...

maybe your most recent post is always editable?

e: nice general idea thoough

This post was edited by Titch on Sat, Mar 14 2009, 03:37pm

this would show up if he edited.

[x] i agree.

Rapture

Member

Posts: 66,644

Joined: Oct 8 2005

Gold: 7,830.00

#24

Mar 23 2009 08:20am

Quote (BikiniGirl @ Sat, Mar 21 2009, 07:24pm)
This post was edited by Titch on Sat, Mar 14 2009, 03:37pm

this would show up if he edited.

[x] i agree.

thanks
Anyone saying no, should at least state a reason as to why [one that actually explains why not one like, "it would be abused"], otherwise i have to just assume you are without logic.

Rapture

Member

Posts: 66,644

Joined: Oct 8 2005

Gold: 7,830.00

#25

Mar 24 2009 07:24am

przy

Member

Posts: 18,697

Joined: Jul 5 2007

Gold: 1,400.00

#26

Mar 24 2009 07:52am

vote no from me - for ladder slasher price check subforum this can be chaotic for price checkers

from a general standpoint, it removes accountability for a person's actions.
people say too many bad things and should get punish. makes no sense to write something horrible and edit it 2 days later if it were never closed or quoted.

Apples

Member

Posts: 7,560

Joined: Jun 21 2006

Gold: 14,180.00

#27

Mar 24 2009 08:58am

I agree good idea Nick.

SMNAC

Member

Posts: 104,473

Joined: Jun 22 2007

Gold: 0.00

#28

Mar 24 2009 12:08pm

I think I saw it suggested before, not sure if it was replied to from the higher authority though! xD

My vote is yes. I don't see how it would cause any troubles imo.

Well, actually.. I don't want infinite editing in the sports forums either.. that can cause issues.
Everywhere else, sure.

MightyBEG

Member

Posts: 4,969

Joined: Feb 19 2007

Gold: 159.28

#29

Mar 25 2009 04:14am

Excellent Idea mate, would halp alot imo.

Greapper

Member

Posts: 57,889

Joined: May 23 2007

Gold: 0.00

#30

Mar 25 2009 04:20am

voted no,
all forums are archived after a month or less anyway (which makes them read only) thus nullifying your infinite edit idea.

members ++ or higher have the ability to edit posts for greater periods of time...
this system is fine the way it is.

This post was edited by Greapper on Mar 25 2009 04:34am

Go Back To Site Suggestions Archive Topic List