d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > d2jsp > Site Suggestions > Site Suggestions Archive >
Poll > Uber/rush Rule Change > To Change The Trade Rules
Prev1234Next
Closed New Topic New Poll
  Guests cannot view or vote in polls. Please register or login.
Member
Posts: 3,267
Joined: Dec 21 2007
Gold: 2,571.00
Nov 21 2008 01:19am
i voted yes on both, we'll c if they cant be changed hey? wink.gif
Member
Posts: 5,019
Joined: Jul 21 2008
Gold: 655.50
Nov 21 2008 01:19am
Quote (Despise_You @ Fri, Nov 21 2008, 01:18am)
Mediator Gangbang @@

I voted no, cuz too many rands run em and shit

And it would stem more problems


There needs to be a new tag

Simple as that


This post was edited by Archnation on Nov 21 2008 01:19am
Member
Posts: 29,002
Joined: Jul 18 2008
Gold: 0.00
Nov 21 2008 01:21am
all this shit still goes on evan with it being against rules the only thing its going to change is being able to lock them if they fuck you over
Member
Posts: 4,985
Joined: Oct 7 2007
Gold: 0.00
Nov 21 2008 02:31am
VOTE FOR OBAMA!
Member
Posts: 1,752
Joined: Oct 5 2008
Gold: 2,390.00
Nov 21 2008 02:43am
yes to both, cuz none of the mods even rush or uL anyone
Member
Posts: 3,963
Joined: Nov 20 2008
Gold: Locked
Nov 21 2008 02:45am
i Voted yes please help out and make it so we the peaple who play d2 can play d2 easer.
Member
Posts: 17,353
Joined: Feb 11 2008
Gold: 0.00
Nov 21 2008 02:54am
Quote (Archnation @ Thu, Nov 20 2008, 11:19pm)
There needs to be a new tag

Simple as that


Vouch that 100%

I voted yes but under certain restrictions. I DO NOT believe that ANYONE should be able to do this. But if this a available service, yet no one with a trusted or even mediator tag EVER EVER EVER does it, then you need to start allowing the people who DO want to provide this service to make it available without risk to their selves?

This is definitely something that needs to be changed. And i will say that it doesn't need to be altered in such a simple way. It needs to still be observed and moderated, but still made accessible and available to the public.
Member
Posts: 3,963
Joined: Nov 20 2008
Gold: Locked
Nov 21 2008 02:55am
Quote (Sinful_Soldiers @ Fri, Nov 21 2008, 08:54am)
Vouch that 100%

I voted yes but under certain restrictions. I DO NOT believe that ANYONE should be able to do this. But if this a available service, yet no one with a trusted or even mediator tag EVER EVER EVER does it, then you need to start allowing the people who DO want to provide this service to make it available without risk to their selves?

This is definitely something that needs to be changed. And i will say that it doesn't need to be altered in such a simple way. It needs to still be observed and moderated, but still made accessible and available to the public.


voutch.
Member
Posts: 19,927
Joined: Sep 20 2007
Gold: 21.51
Nov 21 2008 03:03am
I personally voted NO.
This has been done before, and has proven to be a bad idea.
The rule as it is now works perfectly fine.
Member
Posts: 31,209
Joined: Sep 26 2008
Gold: 0.00
Nov 21 2008 03:08am
Quote (Lithic @ Thu, Nov 20 2008, 09:59pm)

Ubers and rushes are already extremely easy to scam. There really is absolutely no definite way to prove that the person you rushed or uber'd was actually who they said they are. The service maker could easily start a deal with someone, log in another character and claim to be that person and not have anything done as it was "completed" by the given information.


When you go to pm with game and password, you say what character you will be using and what your d2 account will be, simple as that.

I voted yes on both, and I agree there are people who should have a tag for ubers/rushes.

As the current rules state right now, a person could steal a torch even from a mod/trusted user:

"Uber Trist Rules:

* They will be treated like any other service, meaning you must have a trusted tag to offer them.
* You may respond to requests for service without a Trusted Tag.
* You may make topics requesting services affiliated with this.
* All rules regarding services are to remain effective.
* If you're offering the service, your responsibility is to complete it, on time and with no additional cost to your client.

However, we will not support accusations against stealing or the loss of torches, Organ Set, or Game loss. You're doing this at your own risk."

This definition...if I read it right...you could steal the torch even from the mediators because they could not make a supported accusation.

This is one of the things I think needs to be changed...there should be very SPECIFIC rules on how to run an uber (even down to setting them up).

Dunno.
Go Back To Site Suggestions Archive Topic List
Prev1234Next
Closed New Topic New Poll