[QUOTE=Litttle_Brother,Wed, 2 Jul 2008, 14:37]<DIV class=quote1>Quote (yesiammanu @ Mon, 5 May 2008, 06:50)</DIV>
<DIV class=quote2><!--QuoteEBegin-->No from me

You might have to post in your thread before the early bump limit expired because it's not a bump

I.e. "Requesting mediator", "Information (usn/pass) sent"[/QUOTE]

yeah agreed.[/QUOTE]

one more who didn't read the topic

135:122 (of the 120, 84 did not reply at all & 12 of the remainder did not read the post properly - makes it 135:26 really )

[QUOTE=brmv,Wed, Jul 2 2008, 08:28pm][QUOTE=Litttle_Brother,Wed, 2 Jul 2008, 14:37]<DIV class=quote1>Quote (yesiammanu @ Mon, 5 May 2008, 06:50)</DIV>
<DIV class=quote2><!--QuoteEBegin-->No from me

You might have to post in your thread before the early bump limit expired because it's not a bump

I.e. "Requesting mediator", "Information (usn/pass) sent"[/QUOTE]

yeah agreed.[/QUOTE]

one more who didn't read the topic

135:122 (of the 120, 84 did not reply at all & 12 of the remainder did not read the post properly - makes it 135:26 really )[/QUOTE]

Just because they didnt reply doesnt mean their vote doesnt count.
I voted no.
I think its a useless add.
Things are fine the way they are.
You violate the bump rule, you run the chance of getting warned.

Would the 'bumps' go towards the postcount?

yes, bumps do go towards post count - but post count really has nothing to say, except that you made many posts (trading or spamming or whatever)

but

still the same

136:122 (of the 120, 84 did not reply at all & 12 of the remainder did not read the post properly - makes it 136:26 really )

This post was edited by brmv on Jul 8 2008 06:35am

yea they still put it in, not sure if its called a leaf tho, more like a blade of grass, hence bison grass vodka (bison's favorite grass apprently)

i think its unnecesary, give them warns instead.

This post was edited by f10eq on Jul 8 2008 07:02am

ok, i went with no, after reading 10 of the 20 pages, but didnt see my reason there,so
reason is:
Instances such as recent ladder reset have created copious trade threads. Several instances have occured where the moment I post my items(s) for trade, there are so many posts at the same time (admittedly some of these are likely early bumps ), that noone has a chance to even see my post - it is simply gone before I get back to the main trading screen.
Now, obviously, I have no life, but I certainly dont want to wait around for 4 hours so I can bump my thread, only to be swamped again. I consider myself to be an honset rule follower, but I will admit to early bumps in this instance, simply to get my item seen.

Yes, even if the case would be like the one you presented it's still breaking the rules.

Lets give an example if all people drove cross red lights and then you say, "Hey, they damn drivers crossin ma road" and you decide to cross, and as a result we have a carcrash.

Abibe the rules, they have reason existing

~Zvorran

This post was edited by zvorran on Jul 8 2008 07:59am

I for one agree for the most part but sometimes you just gotta bump.
If this happends thinks of this after someones posts "I have this for trade" You cannot respond to them in that post for the bump rule limit That's how it would be, And pms are horrible.

This post was edited by Belldandy on Jul 8 2008 08:17am