d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > d2jsp > Site Suggestions > Site Suggestions Archive >
Poll > Waring System > Only A Little One
Prev116171819Next
Closed New Topic New Poll
  Guests cannot view or vote in polls. Please register or login.
Retired Moderator
Posts: 13,444
Joined: Jan 23 2009
Gold: 13.25
Trader: Trusted
Aug 9 2009 03:42pm
Well i actually voted yes - i like this suggestion! :hug:
Member
Posts: 11,541
Joined: Jun 2 2007
Gold: 0.00
Aug 9 2009 04:28pm
I agree, but the time shouldn't increase by your warn percentage.
I think the time should increase PER the warn you received for spamming.
If you received a warn for something else other than spamming, it shouldn't affect your post time.
Member
Posts: 19,278
Joined: Mar 22 2007
Gold: 2,500.00
Aug 10 2009 04:52pm
Bump
Member
Posts: 25,013
Joined: Sep 27 2008
Gold: 0.00
Aug 10 2009 04:55pm
Quote (PTP63 @ Sat, 23 May 2009, 10:35)
Dumb idea. I can show you that 90% Of spam i the trading forums is by members who have 0-30% Warn.


Dumb Person. I can show you what an Unlocked User Trader Ranked: Not Ranked looks like. Regardless of warn.


Voted [x] Yes. Even w/ 20% warn myself.
Member
Posts: 57,983
Joined: Jan 12 2006
Gold: 5,104.00
Aug 10 2009 05:14pm
Fact : considering the ammount of users warned, that would reduce traffic, cause frustrations which would degenerate in the exact unwanted behaviour.

Dumb suggestion. No.
Member
Posts: 22,675
Joined: Dec 27 2005
Gold: 45,591.26
Trader: Trusted
Aug 10 2009 06:25pm
This is also known as "Ozzy control" and has been suggested several times. The problem with using it on JSP is that a delay of even a few minutes between posts can make it very difficult to trade effectively, and it promoted PM trading if you can only post every 3/5/10/20+ minutes. While it is a decent way to handle spam, it absolutely takes away from the ability to use the site for trading, which is one of its primary uses.
Member
Posts: 19,278
Joined: Mar 22 2007
Gold: 2,500.00
Aug 12 2009 08:00am
Bump
Member
Posts: 38,790
Joined: Apr 5 2008
Gold: 0.01
Aug 12 2009 08:20am
Bad idea imo. The warn is there 2 remind not 2 break the rules and adding to the flood control would just be negating the reason 4 the warn.

if it was givin 4 spam then it would be good but most warns r givin out b/c of other stuff
Member
Posts: 645
Joined: Jul 18 2009
Gold: 0.45
Aug 12 2009 08:22am
good idea for cut the spam :)
Member
Posts: 19,278
Joined: Mar 22 2007
Gold: 2,500.00
Aug 13 2009 09:30am
Bump
Go Back To Site Suggestions Archive Topic List
Prev116171819Next
Closed New Topic New Poll