not a good idea don't like it !
They will start making new threads!

Voted No :

1) It would make people posting on each other topics to avoid the bump rule.
2) It would increase the number of repost for the same topic.
3) Siteload ? (Dunno, maybe, maybe not)

well aware of that possibility, that whould take a little more time for them and would violate rules as well, hopefully would be dealt with



at 1), needs to have a second person there to do that so would happen less than the crazy bumps and since it will be spam can be reported as well
at 2) as above
at 3) the suggestion it itself would not, so please don't throw that in as distraction

119:114 (of the 114, 79 did not reply at all & 10 of the remainder did not read the post properly - makes it 114:25 really)

120:115 (of the 115, 80 did not reply at all & 10 of the remainder did not read the post properly - makes it 115:25 really)

This is not needed.

I dont see the point bumping the topic when you are not online.

another one for the "did not read the post properly" (sad for a mediator), it is to stop bumping early not to bump automatically

120:116 (of the 116, 80 did not reply at all & 11 of the remainder did not read the post properly - makes it 120:25 really)

121:116 (of the 116, 80 did not reply at all & 11 of the remainder did not read the post properly - makes it 121:25 really)

i voted yes,

also you don't have to give a reason to vote. same as in the elections.

so it is 123:117 REALLY.

i know , just trying to tease the compulsive early bumpers who will automatically vote "no" to make a comment
btw, they still put a leaf of grass into Żubrówka?

124:117 (of the 117, 81 did not reply at all & 11 of the remainder did not read the post properly - makes it 124:25 really )

125:117 (of the 117, 81 did not reply at all & 11 of the remainder did not read the post properly - makes it 125:25 really )