d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > d2jsp > Site Suggestions > Site Suggestions Archive >
Poll > Automate Early Bump Control > Have Early Bump Cntrl Like Flood Control
Prev1141516171836Next
Closed New Topic New Poll
  Guests cannot view or vote in polls. Please register or login.
Member
Posts: 26,320
Joined: Sep 16 2007
Gold: 1,725.00
Jun 15 2008 10:50am
Why wouldn't ths havebeen made before?
Because it will hurt the siteload imo,

no
Member
Posts: 2,052
Joined: Apr 20 2008
Gold: 294.00
Jun 15 2008 10:52am
Quote (Zompy @ Sun, Jun 15 2008, 11:50am)
Why wouldn't ths havebeen made before?
Because it will hurt the siteload imo,

no


Please, with massive bump posts it takes up more bandwidth.

Don't tell me you havn't seen a full page of bumps.
Member
Posts: 26,320
Joined: Sep 16 2007
Gold: 1,725.00
Jun 15 2008 10:55am
Quote (silvusx @ Sun, 15 Jun 2008, 18:52)
Please, with massive bump posts it takes up more bandwidth.

Don't tell me you havn't seen a full page of bumps.


If everybod tries to early bump and the system block's it will take more,

did you hear of a warn system?

This post was edited by Zompy on Jun 15 2008 10:56am
Member
Posts: 2,052
Joined: Apr 20 2008
Gold: 294.00
Jun 15 2008 10:57am
Quote (Zompy @ Sun, Jun 15 2008, 11:55am)
If everybod tries to early bump and the system block's it will take more,

did you hear of a warn system?


if early bump wasn't a problem then this post wouldn't be here in the first place.

and if you read first two pages. Mods are no longer taking action unless its excessive.

This post was edited by silvusx on Jun 15 2008 10:58am
Member
Posts: 29,029
Joined: Feb 20 2008
Gold: 0.60
Jun 15 2008 11:35am
i think it would make sense!
Member
Posts: 28,331
Joined: Jun 9 2007
Gold: 11,700.00
Jun 15 2008 12:26pm
Quote (Zompy @ Sun, 15 Jun 2008, 16:50)
Why wouldn't ths havebeen made before?
if that would be an argument, then there would be no need for site suggestions really;
because no-one thought of it when there was no problem?

Because it will hurt the siteload imo,
why? all the information needed to do a simple test is there:
if it is "bump now" = bump
if it is "time" then check user of last post and if = take action, else bump/post
and the action would not really take much more than placing a post

no



104:100 (of the 100, 70 did not reply at all & 9 of the remainder did not read the post properly - makes it 104:21 really)
Member
Posts: 3,119
Joined: Jul 1 2006
Gold: 670.00
Jun 15 2008 09:23pm
Quote (user-name @ Sun, May 4 2008, 03:26pm)
dunno how thatd work but if possible yes good idea


Member
Posts: 12,114
Joined: Mar 7 2006
Gold: 117.00
Jun 15 2008 09:49pm
i didnt read all the post, but heres what i think:

i voted no simply because when i respond to things such as offers im often posting before the 4 hour bump. this is because im either responding to questions, updating list, stating c/o and refusing some offers and other things, and im assuming this would only apply to trading forums
Member
Posts: 17,080
Joined: Apr 14 2007
Gold: 24,416.00
Jun 15 2008 10:18pm
I like the idea.
Member
Posts: 28,331
Joined: Jun 9 2007
Gold: 11,700.00
Jun 15 2008 11:19pm
Quote (HellsArmory @ Mon, 16 Jun 2008, 03:49)
i didnt read all the post, but heres what i think:
i voted no simply because when i respond to things such as offers im often posting before the 4 hour bump. this is because im either responding to questions, updating list, stating c/o and refusing some offers and other things, and im assuming this would only apply to trading forums


pity you didn't because all those occasions you state there are legal and couldn't be dealt with automatically if they follow someone else posting

107:103 (of the 103, 72 did not reply at all & 10 of the remainder did not read the post properly - makes it 107:21 really)
Go Back To Site Suggestions Archive Topic List
Prev1141516171836Next
Closed New Topic New Poll