d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > d2jsp > Site Suggestions > Site Suggestions Archive >
Poll > Waring System > Only A Little One
Prev1131415161719Next
Closed New Topic New Poll
  Guests cannot view or vote in polls. Please register or login.
Member
Posts: 104,473
Joined: Jun 22 2007
Gold: 0.00
Jul 18 2009 01:17pm
I think you have a good base idea here, however may I add some feedback to make the suggestion better? Idk if anyone has said this to you yet but...

How about if their warn was for spam, or excessive flaming (which tends to be spam also) then this would take effect. Even if it's only 10 %, if it was due to spam... then this should take effect. Then with each 10 % they get, it gets higher.

So, 10 % = 130 seconds
20 % = 140 seconds

and so on and so forth...

But, say their first 10 % wasn't for spam.. maybe they posted an outside link or something... or anything other than "spam".. then..

10 % would stay normal ofc, since no spam was happening they shouldn't lose the privilege of posting within 30 seconds imo.
Then they get another 10 % boosting to 20 % now, but this time it was for spam... well now the time should be bumped to however long.. maybe 60 seconds for first offense, 90 seconds for seconds offense or however Paul decides to do it.

That's just my personal opinion and input.. if you have questions to what I meant, just ask and I'll try to explain better but I think I gave the rundown pretty thoroughly. :)
Voted good idea though, ofc. :thumbsup:
Member
Posts: 19,278
Joined: Mar 22 2007
Gold: 2,500.00
Jul 20 2009 12:56pm
Bump
Member
Posts: 93,326
Joined: Jan 24 2009
Gold: Locked
Jul 20 2009 01:40pm
its a good idea
Member
Posts: 19,261
Joined: Oct 23 2003
Gold: 3,454.95
Jul 20 2009 05:33pm
Quote (OverDoSex @ Fri, May 15 2009, 06:13am)
bad. some warns are given out eagerly on bad days for mods. keep it the way it is imo, good idea if all youve ever had is 0% though.


mods only give warns to people deserving of them
i like this idea, quite a bit actually
there needs to be more consequences for getting warned, other than the ugly bar under your name
Member
Posts: 10,434
Joined: Jul 5 2009
Gold: 21.91
Warn: 50%
Jul 20 2009 05:36pm
no.

shit idea - member is member
Member
Posts: 19,278
Joined: Mar 22 2007
Gold: 2,500.00
Jul 21 2009 05:46pm
Bump
Member
Posts: 35,966
Joined: Dec 15 2007
Gold: 67,288.50
Jul 21 2009 06:14pm
seems like a good idea because most spam comes from people with warn, great idea

[x] good idea
Member
Posts: 19,278
Joined: Mar 22 2007
Gold: 2,500.00
Jul 24 2009 07:36am
Bump
Member
Posts: 69,341
Joined: Jun 1 2006
Gold: 84.99
Jul 24 2009 07:38am
I voted no, Sorry nick :(
Member
Posts: 40,947
Joined: Dec 10 2006
Gold: 14.37
Trader: Trusted
Jul 24 2009 07:54am
would be one of the only really useful ways imo.
and i would like to see the counter being increased at 10% warn already, as a lesson.
yes!
Go Back To Site Suggestions Archive Topic List
Prev1131415161719Next
Closed New Topic New Poll