Automate Early Bump Control - Topic

Member

Posts: 28,331

Joined: Jun 9 2007

Gold: 11,700.00

Jun 9 2008 07:08pm

Quote (metalworks @ Mon, 9 Jun 2008, 11:47)

my vote is no.
this idea cant remove "seemingly legal (to the system)" early bumps between the topic makers and their friends.
or they may make another topic in a few minutes once their posts are gone away to the 2nd page.
they, with no patience, will attempt other violations than usual early bump once its disabled
especially in the case of iso grush or uber, which takes not a little time to complete and they need right away.

already commented on argument a few times

plus i got a few PM on similar lines from people who are not allowed to post in this forum

87:81 (of the 81, 55 did not reply at all & 9 of the remainder did not read the post properly - makes it 87:17 really)

brmv

Member

Posts: 28,331

Joined: Jun 9 2007

Gold: 11,700.00

#132

Jun 10 2008 01:27pm

same

sarge799

Member

Posts: 40,900

Joined: Jul 12 2004

Gold: 1,524.85

#133

Jun 10 2008 02:56pm

This would create a mass amount of reposts.
Good idea, but unfortunately things like this don't fix the problem.

0j3pp30

Member

Posts: 7,593

Joined: Feb 7 2007

Gold: 130.00

#134

Jun 10 2008 02:58pm

Quote (sarge799 @ Tue, Jun 10 2008, 08:56pm)

This would create a mass amount of reposts.
Good idea, but unfortunately things like this don't fix the problem.

agree, dont think it would work + im satisfied with how the things are working now .

KOWHeigel

Member

Posts: 7,342

Joined: Feb 14 2008

Gold: 500.12

#135

Jun 10 2008 08:06pm

I would vote yes but i would also vote to reduce the time to 2 hours. I do agree that the early bump is a pain if you don't do it and it leaves you in the position where you have to early bump to have anyone view your post. Original posts go off the first page in mere seconds if its a high traffic time and if you don't early bump then someone else is selling their items. It is a vicious cycle.

brmv

Member

Posts: 28,331

Joined: Jun 9 2007

Gold: 11,700.00

#136

Jun 11 2008 04:13pm

Quote (KOWHeigel @ Wed, 11 Jun 2008, 02:06)

I would vote yes but i would also vote to reduce the time to 2 hours. I do agree that the early bump is a pain if you don't do it and it leaves you in the position where you have to early bump to have anyone view your post. Original posts go off the first page in mere seconds if its a high traffic time and if you don't early bump then someone else is selling their items. It is a vicious cycle.

a reduction in the bump time might help as well, less people would start to immitate the asocial behaviour of the constant violators

90:84 (of the 84, 57 did not reply at all & 9 of the remainder did not read the post properly - makes it 90:18 really)

ultima1

Banned

Posts: 29,709

Joined: Jun 25 2007

Gold: 475.00

Warn: 50%

#137

Jun 12 2008 09:39am

No, I like Early Bumping once every now and then.

brmv

Member

Posts: 28,331

Joined: Jun 9 2007

Gold: 11,700.00

#138

Jun 12 2008 09:50am

Quote (ultima1 @ Thu, 12 Jun 2008, 15:39)

No, I like Early Bumping once every now and then.

- but at least he is honest

90:88 (of the 88, 60 did not reply at all & 9 of the remainder did not read the post properly - makes it 90:19 really)

deathsjb

Member

Posts: 3,203

Joined: Aug 28 2006

Gold: 0.00

#139

Jun 12 2008 09:58am

eh...its good idea in general...but so many flaws...ppl can repost or get a friend to bump the thread..but still a yes from me if the kinks can get worked out.

MiniMac

Member

Posts: 2,008

Joined: Nov 26 2007

Gold: Locked

Trader: Scammer

Warn: 10%

#140

Jun 12 2008 10:03am

Quote (brmv @ Thu, Jun 12 2008, 10:50am)

- but at least he is honest

90:88 (of the 88, 60 did not reply at all & 9 of the remainder did not read the post properly - makes it 90:19 really)

what kind of logic is that...?
we dont owe you an explanation, face it your idea kinda sucks

Go Back To Site Suggestions Archive Topic List