d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > d2jsp > Site Suggestions > Site Suggestions Archive >
Poll > Should Jsp Policy Be Changed > Read First, Before Vote
Prev12347Next
Closed New Topic New Poll
  Guests cannot view or vote in polls. Please register or login.
Member
Posts: 38,544
Joined: Oct 25 2008
Gold: 300.00
Jun 2 2011 11:32pm
just for fun you can all review mine here and tell me your opinions

http://forums.d2jsp.org/topic.php?t=55241072&f=250
Member
Posts: 33,405
Joined: Apr 20 2007
Gold: 233,550.69
Trader: Trusted
Jun 2 2011 11:45pm
this site is all about money logic is not found here
Member
Posts: 15,279
Joined: Jan 24 2007
Gold: 69.69
Jun 2 2011 11:46pm
agreed with right proof, attempted murder is classified as a crime, they dont say well they didnt quite complete the job so come back when they have, if there is sufficient proof someone attempted a scam they should be locked as a precaution. i think jsp mods etc have a duty of care to its members to avoid potential scams in that if evidence shows a user is attempting scamming for other legit users safety they should be dealt with

This post was edited by mal69 on Jun 2 2011 11:47pm
Member
Posts: 38,544
Joined: Oct 25 2008
Gold: 300.00
Jun 2 2011 11:48pm
Quote (mal69 @ Jun 2 2011 10:46pm)
agreed with right proof, attempted murder is classified as a crime, they dont say well they didnt quite complete the job so come back when they have, if there is sufficient proof someone attempted a scam they should be locked as a precaution. i think jsp mods etc have a duty of care to its members to avoid potential scams in that if evidence shows a user is attempting scamming for other legit users safety they should be dealt with


i am in love <3
Member
Posts: 46,003
Joined: Aug 31 2006
Gold: 0.00
Jun 3 2011 12:09am
Honestly, I voted no. Morally speaking, you're right, they should be locked. It is very possible to present enough proof to prove someone was going to attempt to scam someone else (how else would people get arrested for attempted murder?). However, the issue here is that JSP does not have the "staff" necessary to support the S/As that would be generated should the rules be changed. As it stands it's a difficult and lengthy process to get someone locked. If anything should be changed, it should be the rules regarding loans. In that case, it's very obvious that they stole the FG and it is extremely easy to provide the necessary proof.

Edit: It's extremely easy to say "Well, Njag should just recruit more people". However, that will never happen. He invests a lot of time as it is and personally has nothing to gain out of taking the time to recruit more moderators to deal with the influx of S/As. I think it's important to take into account not only what is morally correct, but also what is feasible.

This post was edited by Furthur on Jun 3 2011 12:12am
Member
Posts: 38,544
Joined: Oct 25 2008
Gold: 300.00
Jun 3 2011 12:37pm
more votes
Member
Posts: 70,459
Joined: Feb 3 2006
Gold: 28,299.69
Jun 3 2011 12:39pm
Minority Report.
Member
Posts: 18,675
Joined: Oct 11 2006
Gold: 43,996.00
Jun 3 2011 01:37pm
Yes they should be locked, cause then they will try to attempt a scam on someone else till succeed!

Member
Posts: 38,544
Joined: Oct 25 2008
Gold: 300.00
Jun 3 2011 03:23pm
Quote (FlowiZ @ Jun 3 2011 12:37pm)
Yes they should be locked, cause then they will try to attempt a scam on someone else till succeed!


yep, people dont seem to understand that. If they are trying to scam they are not going to target one person.
Member
Posts: 52,083
Joined: Jan 4 2008
Gold: 6,940.00
Jun 3 2011 03:25pm
Yes
Go Back To Site Suggestions Archive Topic List
Prev12347Next
Closed New Topic New Poll