Quote (Lunarya @ May 1 2011 07:49am)
I totally agree. Being locked is a very sensitive issue for the person that is locked. You would not want others to invade your privacy in any way as well.

I fail to see how a person being locked and/or accused in S/A isn't already available to the public.
I would not mind people being able to see why I was locked.
For example, let's say that hypothetically I buy FG via paypal and the order messes up, causing me to be locked.
I would prefer people to be able to click and see that I am locked for issues about payment and I am not locked because I have necessarily scammed anybody.
Quote (Bloody_hell123 @ May 1 2011 07:43am)
Voted no, your issues is to yourself, not for the world to see.
Not true, the issues are all available in S/A forum (with the exception of things like payment issues), and anybody can go in and read those.
Quote (Legacy843 @ Apr 30 2011 05:56pm)
No from me. A user can be locked for numerous reasons and imo its just not necessary.
Users can even request being locked for a period of time due to account security issues
Precisely my point! When people see a "Locked" tag, they assume the person has scammed somebody.
If we implemented such a feature, people could simply click on where it says "Locked" and see that it is attributed to "Security Issues", "Payment Issues", etc.
Most of the posts in this thread are saying that issues involving Locked users are private, but that is not true as the S/A forum is available for everyone to view and people are accused and evidence posted in there all the time. Perhaps it is correct that it should not tell a user is Locked for "Payment Issues", but it could simply say if it was a general site issue or if it was due to a Scammer Accusation.