d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > d2jsp > Site Suggestions > Site Suggestions Archive >
Poll > An Easier Method To Prevent Early-bumps > Same Method As The Anti-30 Second Postin
Prev12345Next
Closed New Topic New Poll
  Guests cannot view or vote in polls. Please register or login.
Member
Posts: 31,680
Joined: Nov 10 2007
Gold: 1.00
Jan 23 2010 11:10am
Quote (Greapper @ 23 Jan 2010 11:07)
I disagree because people would just post another thread instead of bumping their current thread... your suggestion solves nothing.


They close threads as is, which means the current system isn't working out.


Quote (Cambridge @ 23 Jan 2010 11:07)
Haven't we all?
I would probably start taking the time to report again when I see a violation if anything ever got done about it.
There's no point in wasting the time reporting just so they can close, if no warns are handed out and they make another topic 45 seconds later.


Exactly.

Also, hi Cambridge. :)
Member
Posts: 57,889
Joined: May 23 2007
Gold: 0.00
Jan 23 2010 11:14am
Quote (Muted @ 24 Jan 2010 02:10)
They close threads as is, which means the current system isn't working out.


Well the system hasn't been working since I joined... The JSP mod team is content with the fail system they have going.
All the old moderators that did actually issue warns for early bumps / spamming are long retired.

All the new mods are 15 years old & want to spread smiley faces & rainbows all over the forums instead of actually enforcing the rules.

i've seen the new mods issue 5 + verbals to users within an hour & still not give the user a warn.

(whereas on the other hand i get issued 10% at 60 days for calling a guy an "idiot" ...
I'm still iso my site suggestion to be filled that i posted in the donor forums.... aka not let anyone under the age of 20 become a members ++ or higher)
Member
Posts: 31,680
Joined: Nov 10 2007
Gold: 1.00
Jan 23 2010 11:16am
Quote (Greapper @ 23 Jan 2010 11:14)
Well the system hasn't been working since I joined... The JSP mod team is content with the fail system they have going.
All the old moderators that did actually issue warns for early bumps / spamming are long retired.

All the new mods are 15 years old & want to spread smiley faces & rainbows all over the forums instead of actually enforcing the rules.

i've seen the new mods issue 5 + verbals to users within an hour & still not give the user a warn.

(whereas on the other hand i get issued 10% at 60 days for calling a guy an "idiot" ...
I'm still iso my site suggestion to be filled that i posted in the donor forums.... aka not let anyone under the age of 20 become a members ++ or higher)


Why exactly do you troll around when you think somewhat intelligently? :mellow:
Member
Posts: 57,889
Joined: May 23 2007
Gold: 0.00
Jan 23 2010 11:17am
Quote (Muted @ 24 Jan 2010 02:16)
Why exactly do you troll around when you think somewhat intelligently? :mellow:


for +1s ofc.
Member
Posts: 31,680
Joined: Nov 10 2007
Gold: 1.00
Jan 23 2010 11:19am
Quote (Greapper @ 23 Jan 2010 11:17)
for +1s ofc.


I'd reply to your larger post but, I've come to realize you'll only point out more flaws in the system...
... and the simple fact that: Either the site owner doesn't care, or is too "busy" to fix himself, and refuses aid from anyone else.

:(
Member
Posts: 13,415
Joined: Nov 2 2006
Gold: 10,868.00
Jan 23 2010 11:20am
Quote (Greapper @ Jan 23 2010 04:57pm)
Voted no,
they'd just make a new topic instead of bumping the old one.


well the system could stop this too, i think it would be good if it was implemented
Member
Posts: 57,889
Joined: May 23 2007
Gold: 0.00
Jan 23 2010 11:21am
Quote (Muted @ 24 Jan 2010 02:19)
I'd reply to your larger post but, I've come to realize you'll only point out more flaws in the system...
... and the simple fact that: Either the site owner doesn't care, or is too "busy" to fix himself, and refuses aid from anyone else.

:(


Paul hardly does any "moderating" it's basically up to the mod team to determine warns / enforce the rules.
If anyone is failing ... it's not Paul... it's all the 16 year olds on power trips
Member
Posts: 31,680
Joined: Nov 10 2007
Gold: 1.00
Jan 23 2010 11:23am
Quote (Greapper @ 23 Jan 2010 11:21)
Paul hardly does any "moderating" it's basically up to the mod team to determine warns / enforce the rules.
If anyone is failing ... it's not Paul... it's all the 16 year olds on power trips


He's the one who refuses to place more than 4 "Senior Moderators" at a time.
He's the one who refuses to place more than 8 "Jr. Moderators" at a time.
He's the one who chooses to let 16 year olds on power trips (DoomOnYou, Paprick) be "in charge."
He's the one-- etc.

It's his site, he lacks moderation himself, and doesn't (apparently) do anything to change/enforce it.
Member
Posts: 57,889
Joined: May 23 2007
Gold: 0.00
Jan 23 2010 11:25am
Quote (Muted @ 24 Jan 2010 02:23)
He's the one who refuses to place more than 4 "Senior Moderators" at a time.
He's the one who refuses to place more than 8 "Jr. Moderators" at a time.
He's the one who chooses to let 16 year olds on power trips (DoomOnYou, Paprick) be "in charge."
He's the one-- etc.

It's his site, he lacks moderation himself, and doesn't (apparently) do anything to change/enforce it.


lol'd at paparick being 16 years old...

You clearly don't understand how the mod team is chosen if you think Paul is the one who hand picks each person.

It's up to a vote between all current mod team members who's in & who's out.

We don't need more Senior mods anyway.... we need more junior / trade mods.
Member
Posts: 31,680
Joined: Nov 10 2007
Gold: 1.00
Jan 23 2010 11:28am
Quote (Greapper @ 23 Jan 2010 11:25)
lol'd at Paparick being 16 years old...
You clearly don't understand how the mod team is chosen if you think Paul is the one who hand picks each person.
It's up to a vote between all current mod team members who's in & who's out.
We don't need more Senior mods anyway.... we need more junior / trade mods.


1 - I wasn't saying he was 16, but sure does act like it
2 - Nope, I don't understand. But I can see the overall effects
3. M'kay
4. Exactly, and SOMEBODY made the idea there's X number of max moderators out there (guess who?)
Go Back To Site Suggestions Archive Topic List
Prev12345Next
Closed New Topic New Poll