No. No. No. Thats not what I was trying to convey. Read the Third post of the thread.

Im confused then.
What are you trying to say?

yea how paul has it now it is really retarded.

if you need to read a guide to be able to update your friends list, then something is wrong with the friends list.


for starters if you only want to edit one friend or move them you have to edit everything else if they move a position and if you don't check something or forget something you basically have to start all fucking over again, he really needs to come up with something better I don't even use my friends list because its so stupid, makes me not wanna have any e friends lol.

So much unneeded work.

This post was edited by 2003 on Nov 4 2009 07:54am

The current ranking system has it backwards. Instead of having your number 1 ranked friend on the top of your top 6 list, he/she would instead be on the bottom of that list.

Voted No, i agree with how it is, Higher the number, higher on the list they go.

I know what this thread is for, the way it currently works is fine everyone is default to 1 instead of having to be calculated their proper number based on previous number of friends.
All you have to do is make the top a number above 1, 1 < 2 < 3 < 4

This post was edited by BkK on Nov 4 2009 12:41pm

Nty!...

Voted no, sorry. The current system makes sense to me: it's similar to a "ladder", the highest rank appears on top.

[edit]
Rank is not always the same as position, in this case it's only a classification number.
Replace "rank" with "level" in your head and you hopefully understand my point.
The better someone's rank is, the higher he will appear in the "friendlist's ladder".

This post was edited by Qry on Nov 5 2009 04:42pm

But the top position in ladder is always assigned 1 not higher numbers.

This post was edited by AsIs on Nov 5 2009 11:43am

I've always thought the same way tbh.

Voted yes.



Usually a ladder would have #1 at the top... and work it's way down, no?

This post was edited by Lyricist on Nov 5 2009 11:54am