Yes, why not.

Thanks for your votes.

Bump

You got my vote!

That's pretty selfish then. If you are a SA helper, you'd be ought to just check the topic list instead of the last post.

And then; all posts are equal. If somebody "cries" because he should be unlocked, that person's opinion should be heard.

i agree not only is it a change but it will reduce time but metal works has a valid point to as a scammer topic ofc is more important and takes a high priority over a a multi accusation and a "why am i locked" topic.

the thing is i see your point in everything should be an equal but it does not work so well in all cases. for example you have a person A who has been scammed and you have person B who is reporting a muliti acc and then you have person C, who has been locked and pleading to have his penaulty overturned. Now if it worked how you mentioned it there is a 1/3 chances one of these posts will be a priority, in the worst cases person A is left in the dark despite having a more serious problem.. by the time they get arround to person A the scammer has allready used the fg or passed it to his m8 and so if he gets locked he still has partially got away with it.

In the real world this is how things are run. The bigger priority things always come over the smaller priority of things, If you go to the police a man who robbed a shop is not going to get the same priority over someone who killed a couple ppl.

That's why I said that people should check the threads list instead of the last post.
Moreover, most "approved helpers" and "mediators" have their own place to be. For example, Sabine does not busy herself with people pleading to be unlocked. Her spot is the Scammer Accusations itself. So even if there are some posts in the "last post" that do not attract her attention, she'll simply refresh, and see a thread that does.

Yes!

true true but how the system work now is others can be warned much better i.e ("xxx scammed me 500 fg") because this comes up alot this means others can see on the main forum page who to look out for in trades. If then can allocate a person to each of the sections then it might work well (not 100% sure if they do that)

I still think this is not more important than the fact that every person's opinion is equal.

On a lighter note, it is generally accepted that somebody who is punished for something they did NOT do, is worse than somebody who does not get punished for something they DID. I think that's another, pretty acceptable, reason to add the subforums to the list, and to give everybody the same chances to be heard.