not always true, i got pmed from a members++ before for being only 3 kb over

Yes make it in the profile somewhere and add up a list of violations

Illegal picture
Too big bla bla bla

Bump (24 hours later).

I can only tell that personally I like things to be 100% true and finished.
Therefore I guess that minor edit in sig/ava rules should be made to avoid possible "holes in the law"

P.S. I wish if we could make hard disk/ cd/dvd/memory manufacturers to stop using that 1024 thing for their own benefit

Exactly.
I just think this will make it clear to everyone that isn't sure, or just simply doesn't know
how many bytes are in a kilobyte. Some people may even think/think they know that there are 1,000 (or even a different amount of bytes)
bytes in a kilobyte. This will basically clear all of the confusion.

Haha, yeah, I think 1,000 per ___ is a lot better of a number than the random 1,024. xD

why not?

Thank you for your opinion, peterpants!

Yes actually would help members++ too if those over 70.000 bytes but under 70KBytes Signatures get not reported any longer

Im sure, if someone reports a signature on random its not going to be becouse of a few bytes/kbs over.
A one off report is going to be made becouse of a big violation.
And if a regular reporter, the M++ could spend a moment explaining this.
I had and never report those under 80 since.

But at the end of the day, its what ever those qualified people say, if they say it would be easier, it should be changed.

Yeah, I always knew there were people that reported even the slightest violations, and made mistakes
due to being unaware of this. I know I've made that mistake before. xD



And that's exactly why I felt it was necessary to make this suggestion.