I've seen an S/A with a shit load of proof but the user did not get locked.

well its obv that the trusteds will be bias agents locking a trusted user. but nothing is solid because everything can be edited/ changed to make it should real/fake.

This post was edited by lilwillis121 on Mar 22 2009 08:28pm

Trusted users have been stripped of their tags, and sometimes banned.

The evidence must be CONCRETE against them, because they are more credible than you.

I think it's fine the way it is, otherwise you'll have even more people claiming that this person screwed them out of this service...etc, used to be a huge problem, there are still people in SA that complain that they got screwed out of a service, even with this rule. Voted "Yes". Apologies all around.

This post was edited by lncarnaxim on Mar 22 2009 08:30pm

Suggested daily?

Won't be changed

Yes you need a tag to do services.

This post was edited by SnifY on Mar 22 2009 10:28pm

early bumpers should never be allowed to post service topics.
or their minutes per bump/repost will fill the top 50 topics to bring down other legal trade topics.

yes, you should need a tt.
tt works very well as a filter to exclude those rule violators as well as possible scammers. and it can be easily lost for those violations.

Although it is good that you must be trusted to offer a service like that, so many people offer them anyway and people still take the risk that it should be allowed like betting just not supported.

Your a jan 09 rand, what would you know about trust, maybe knowing someone for like 2-3 years, and not being in any trouble might be potentally deserving of one, who is active, and very tradeable.

Useast softcore ladder has a mediator hosting ubers/grush



We are hosting them, just keep your eyes open.

This suggestion wont happen.

voted no.

this would only increase people scmaming.

the rule is fine how it is.

if you really want to offer services, become friends with a trusted and get them to host a lvling service.