did you know the reason behind his flaming?

but w/e idt it will eer change from a month because there is already enough spam and if warns were shorter for spam than more people might do it.

How is twelve separate violations a minor infraction? I've got my warn for creating ONE thread and I'm not complaining. People wait a year from the time they click request removal to get their 10% off. Stop complaining. You did something wrong, so now you have to accept the punishment.

it was spam/flame each time. the kid deserved it at the time trust me if you were in my shoes it would have gotten worse than where i got it to be. im just saying the wait time is too long

it is not the moderator's fault if you cannot follow the forum rules. members who follow the rules don't have problems with warns. members who don't follow them deserve their warns and the consequences.
i don't think this will change

Im 100% sure this is a major key on the website:
"treat others as you would like to be treated" he got back what he treated me. and you havent had 50% warn you dont know how long it is to get all of those warns off

Current system is just fine as it.

More warn at once? More wait!

The good thinking would be: Don't receive any warn at all -- Instead of your idea.

well, how many violations you have to do for 50% warn? i'm sure that you need to violate the forum rules several times for 50% warn. if people cannot stop spamming / early bumping / flaming / ... at 10, 20 or 30% - it is just fair that their warn level increases. and it is just fair that they have to wait. do you think that someone will change his behaviour if he can be sure to get his next warn removed in 30 days?
if someone gets 10% warn - ok, that can happen and it's not hard to get it removed if he behaves well. but if he continues his behaviour, his warn level will increase. if 1 warn per 30 days would be removed, he could jut wait 30 days, get his warn removed and continue his bad behaviour. with the current system he will need to wait much longer.

and no, i never had 50% warn. i had 10% ~1 year ago, and i did my best to get them removed.

This post was edited by tcl on Jan 25 2009 08:39pm

Umm, i was hoping this would say make the wait longer,
No Terrible idea, You shouldnt recive warns in the first place

you think i planned on having even a 10% warn?


you cant expect the unexpected.

iso more votes

It's clearly not, since you're still trying to justify that breaking the rules was correct.