what do you guys think


Please post if you think Jlzm and B0N3R should become trusted

/e so far agree is winning


/e this is for all east

lad nl classic hc etc..

This post was edited by B0N3R on Oct 6 2012 02:36pm

Use the report button.



Voted no.



http://forums.d2jsp.org/topic.php?t=64788419&f=258&p=433474784

This post was edited by Djsem on Oct 6 2012 02:30pm

I agree, we have 1 dude who is trusted who ever gets on our forum,

there is relentless spam that never gets closed unless there is mass reporting going on,

it would just be nice to have a few extra members to help keep alil more order

edit:



Not gonna say who I think should or shouldn't be trusted tho

This post was edited by jlzm on Oct 6 2012 02:28pm

also need more for scammer accusation and such

by the time they get to you even if u have all the proof needed the guy has time to send fg to a multi

i had all the proof took till 2marrow and the guy had 0 fgs by then.



i understand were your getting at but you havent been on useast forums in a while from what i saw.

This post was edited by B0N3R on Oct 6 2012 02:41pm

not vouching any1 but we need more trusted period...

Jeff (Bon3r) has my vote for trusted, can say as to jlzm haven't ever had any dealings with him that I can recall and even then to say one should be trusted would take a whole hell of a lot anyways. Bon3r although I met probably my first week on JSP and we started out just trading among one another, but that led to much more and now I know if I was ever in need he'd be one person I could count on to help, and I know he'd happily do so. Great guy that I would trust and should IMO be trusted by all :).

Thanks man

only time i've ever seen threads closed is when I directly pmd a moderator about them,... At the very least the forums need to be monitored more

Site Suggestions is a place to suggest features for the site, not about who should do what or what should happen to x person. Have a look here: http://forums.d2jsp.org/topic.php?t=57896631&f=258.



From a user standpoint, the evidence might be apparent, but the staff are very strict with how they deal with accusations. The evidence must 100% prove that the user committed the said scam; this means literally every "base" needs to be covered in the evidence provided.
They aren't just going to lock the user during the accusation thread without full evidence since that would be unfair and could easily be abused. Because of this, it's always a good policy to ensure you include all the evidence you can and be sure most, if not all in the very first post, as to ensure the accusation thread can get done ASAP.



They're not just going to lurk the Trading Grounds, hoping a rule is broken somewhere. When you report a thread, you get a message saying "thanks for your help in making this site cleaner", or something along the lines. This means we too must do our part in ensuring the forums are free from rule-breaking posts, so if you see a rule being broken, report the post and move on. Eventually it will be tended to, as these posts are put into a queue for the staff member to deal with.

im suggesting the site to get more trusted members