Requiring all new users (and existing users) to have a minimum IQ of 70 (or at least pass a basic literacy test in their native language) would prevent my eyes from bleeding everytime I view the vile filth that passes for english here.

For new users, part of the registration process would involve taking one of these tests.
For existing users, a mandatory test would take the place of the normal jsp interface the next time a user tries to access the site.
Upon completion of the exam, they would either be redirected back to jsp or banned on the spot.

Feel free to comment.

This post was edited by MadWorld on Mar 31 2010 08:59am

+ 1

This post was edited by Twiiddle on Mar 31 2010 09:00am

1. Stupid idea.
2. Even if it was implemented -> Google

They should add a wall of text you had to read, then answer some questions that are in the text.

say's the 09

First of all, if you don't like it, theres a log out button. Second of all, It's not a good idea. As Some people aren't as "smart" as you, although i doubt you would pass your own test.

Edit: Also, Seeing has English isn't always everyone's first language, that would apply too. People who's first language isn't English try very hard to talk with English speakers anyway. So Nice try on flaming everyone Foreign.

This post was edited by Rickie on Mar 31 2010 09:04am

130+, thanks.



Join date and stupidity are two entirely different subjects.



I'm not flaming anyone foreign.
Most of them speak better english than these kids.

This post was edited by MadWorld on Mar 31 2010 09:05am

Or how about we make a rule that says anyone over 10% warn doesn't get access to the site anymore either? Because if you think about it, a sign of stupidity is not learning from your mistakes, so therefore anyone with a warning after the first one, by that standard, would be considered stupid? So by your standard, that would make them unable to access the site if your "idea" was implemented. That would also make you unable to access it.

Edit: This isn't flaming, it's just showing him how outlandish his suggestion is.

This post was edited by Rickie on Mar 31 2010 09:14am

1) That's what the 100% warn mark and banned group are already for.
2) You can get 10% for accidentally posting in the s/a forum. You would remove site access from people who have 6 subforums open at once and make a mistake?

2) you can edit and say i'm sorry and they won't warn you, so i know that that is incorrect.