I have seen 06 members with thousands of posts....NOT TRUSTED. Ok, what is this. Obviously hes going to be trusted, but can't offer services.

IMHO. There should be a tag that is called "Somethat Trusted." That way people that run LEGIT SHIT can actually run stuff.

I think that after 500-1000 posts and NO WARN WHATSOEVER that people get this tag. It would make more people able to trade more goods and services available.

I also believe that gubers and grushes should be on a basis of X amount of deaths or time waited results in refund (just as basis not forum rules). I have personally refunded people and believe
it is the right thing to do.

Sorry for my rant.
Any spam will be reported.
Lmk your thoughts in an intellectual post please and thank you for your time.

This post was edited by mrbulldog on Jul 30 2009 02:51pm

No , scammer will stay clean till they get the tag then there gonna scam since they got a tag.

NO to this idea

Ok, well how about some sort of compromise. Instead of saying NO, how about a suggestion?

No, posts mean nothing -- they can all be spam in the general chat for all we know.

Ouch, no for sure. An automatic system is way to fragile. Also (despite many reasons to add tags), njaguar and his playmates have already decided that no more trader tags will be added.

No, it is fine as it is.
And I'm 99% sure that won't be changed.

no
06 spawns = scammers imo

A suggestion? YOU posted your suggestion for people say yes or no , im saying no to your suggestion, My personnal tought, Also if u realy want a suggestion then mine is that everything about tags stay like it is.

"You're not going to be trusted because of the tag, you are going to be tagged because of the trust"

Just because a user stays clean for however long doesn't mean they deserve the honor of being trusted, getting a trusted tag takes a long time, and a lot of hardwork.

Ok well, When i have gubers/grushes i obviously mean no harm to the community. And people will realize this. But i get my topics closed although im on all night and day practically?

And I somewhat agree with you guys, but then could we have some sort of mediators that realize who to trust and not to trust n such?

This post was edited by mrbulldog on Jul 30 2009 02:56pm