d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > d2jsp > Site Suggestions > Site Suggestions Archive > Scammers
12Next
Closed New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 883
Joined: Nov 20 2008
Gold: 0.00
Nov 26 2008 03:23am
Sticky thread in each trade forum posted as "Suspected scammers." And poeple can post names. and then we can check list to see if we should deal with that person. Mods wouldn't have ot look over it. user maintained.
Member
Posts: 3,238
Joined: Aug 16 2008
Gold: 1,058.00
Nov 26 2008 03:29am
I think if a thread like this would exist and not be under mod supervision, people would just post people's names randomly or just people they don't like. It wouldn't really do any good at preventing scams, either. It'd most likely do more harm than good, for example to users who are disliked (aka someone just randomly posts their username in the thread) but who are fair traders.

Since there's no poll, I can't vote, but you probably got an idea of what I would vote. Just my two cents here smile.gif
Member
Posts: 17,045
Joined: Feb 3 2007
Gold: 0.19
Nov 26 2008 03:30am
going to say no how easy would it be for someone to say NeoLzuruha is a scammer and you to end up on that list? seems pointless to me
Member
Posts: 9,169
Joined: May 26 2008
Gold: 0.30
Warn: 20%
Nov 26 2008 03:33am
definately not. Scammers with proof should be accused in the S/A section. If theres no proof then how can we know that that person is a scammer?
Adding that would just create false accusations and rage.
Member
Posts: 21,075
Joined: Apr 4 2007
Gold: 0.00
Nov 26 2008 03:36am
no
Member
Posts: 17,026
Joined: Apr 26 2008
Gold: 11,920.00
Nov 26 2008 03:37am
No..
Member
Posts: 883
Joined: Nov 20 2008
Gold: 0.00
Nov 26 2008 03:37am
Quote (WaRmAnIaC @ Wed, Nov 26 2008, 09:33am)
definately not. Scammers with proof should be accused in the S/A section. If theres no proof then how can we know that that person is a scammer?
Adding that would just create false accusations and rage.


You ever submited osmthing to the Scammers thread? I have. The guy scammed 6 more people before a mod even looked at it. and when he did. he did nothing

The current system doesn't work.
Member
Posts: 883
Joined: Nov 20 2008
Gold: 0.00
Nov 26 2008 03:40am
Quote (Insane1 @ Wed, Nov 26 2008, 09:30am)
going to say no how easy would it be for someone to say NeoLzuruha is a scammer and you to end up on that list? seems pointless to me


For this problem have posted a punishment for falusly accusing someone. 10% warning. thats why we have this system.
Member
Posts: 17,045
Joined: Feb 3 2007
Gold: 0.19
Nov 26 2008 03:40am
Quote (NeoLzuruha @ Wed, Nov 26 2008, 08:07pm)
You ever submited osmthing to the Scammers thread? I have. The guy scammed 6 more people before a mod even looked at it. and when he did. he did nothing

The current system doesn't work.


this system your suggesting is even worse you could label anyone as a scammer if your worried so much request a mediator thats what there here for
Member
Posts: 883
Joined: Nov 20 2008
Gold: 0.00
Nov 26 2008 03:43am
Quote (tricycle @ Wed, Nov 26 2008, 09:29am)
I think if a thread like this would exist and not be under mod supervision, people would just post people's names randomly or just people they don't like. It wouldn't really do any good at preventing scams, either. It'd most likely do more harm than good, for example to users who are disliked (aka someone just randomly posts their username in the thread)  but who are fair traders.

Since there's no poll, I can't vote, but you probably got an idea of what I would vote. Just my two cents here smile.gif


People can Vouge for someone. and the list would only be a suggestion. only a way to get a warning out.

Most people don't take the time to chech the reported users list. so right now alot of people are defenless agast this sort of thing. and everytime someoen trys to warn people they;re thread gets removed and closed.
Go Back To Site Suggestions Archive Topic List
12Next
Closed New Topic New Poll