Quote (ofthevoid @ Feb 28 2020 07:45pm)
This is the opposite of reality. Demand for US assets because of their overall safety and performance has certainly increased their price as more institutions, funds, investors pile into US markets. Index funds are made of individual stocks so whether someones buying the SPY index or buying SPY components of that index, the index is going up. Are you really trying to say individual components are somehow independent of the index they are part of or vice versa?
You're conflating two separate things here:
Quote
Demand for US assets because of their overall safety and performance has certainly increased their price as more institutions, funds, investors pile into US markets.
Of course. US companies are making higher profits than ever before and have plenty of cash in the bank. Even so, the S&P 500 P/E ratio of 22 is far below pre recession levels of 60+ or the historical average.
Quote
Index funds are made of individual stocks so whether someones buying the SPY index or buying SPY components of that index, the index is going up.
This is fundamentally incorrect. Indexes will buy or sell the market allocation of stocks at the price determined by active traders. Prices are unaffected because you're going by the ask price while buying/selling in the
same ratio as the active traders, you don't even know the price until the market has closed. If you were buying shares in a fund you'd affect prices on a relative level because the relative weighting of stocks in some companies would be greater than others, but this is not true of index funds or indexed ETFs.
I would recommend reading Smarter Investing by Tim Hale that explains this concept a lot better than I can.
I think you've just got it in your head that stocks are overvalued and you're making everything fit into that narrative. It's certainly possible stocks are overvalued but your arguments as to
why are incorrect.