Quote (Melatonina @ Jan 5 2024 02:01am)
Right, so how come they're talking about a L2 in their roadmap to increase scalability, aswell as this
Note that to support "microtransactions", Bitcoin and Monero are likely to support systems like the "Lightning network" in order to radically reduce the cost of small payments in the future"
https://www.monero.how/how-long-do-monero-transactions-takeit has been brought up but the consensus stays that it's not needed and pretty much "fuck that"
the bottleneck isnt the blockchain itself since monero has dynamic blocksize and can pretty much scale to infinite (bitcoin has fixed size blocks hence the tx/s limitation and the debate with btc split with bch to increase the blocksize which satoshi was also in favor for)
the bottleneck would be internet speed / ssd speeds, which... putting drives in RAID can increase their speed, using multiple WAN and setting networks in LAGG or whatever can increase internet speeds, the technology on that end keeps evolving as well, however if adoption such as the mastercard network were to ever happen, a phone most likely wouldnt be able to be a full node no more, could still have the storage space and the ssd speed maybe (UFS 3.1 / UFS 4.0 are as fast as NVMe drives), bottleneck would be the internet speed, vps would still be able to, home networks would still be able to but regular joe and jane on that pixel phone or iphone or whatever would have to use remote node most likely in such scenario, a layer 2 would alleviate the transactions happening on layer 1 to save like some disk space or whatever to help reduce the requirement to run a full node
so yeah overall the consensus is that, there is no need for that or at least definitely not something worth working on and using dev resources on that which, who even knows what type of hardware will be in the future when it might maybe have some sort of usecase but not really
Quote (Melatonina @ Jan 5 2024 02:01am)
"However, it is not enough to rely on that announcement, because the sender could make multiple such announcements in an attempt to 'double spend' their funds.
right because spending hundred of millions of dollars in doing a whole network attack to trying to doublespend when purchasing a coffee is totally worth it
in all seriousness, real world scenario, 0-conf is safe
if wanting to do an expensive purchase like buying a car, house of whatever, definitely got the time to wait couple confirmations "just in case" while signing the lease or whatever
Quote (Melatonina @ Jan 5 2024 02:01am)
the comics you posted is funny but not accurate,
1 without priv key robbing a ledger is useless

Quote (Melatonina @ Jan 5 2024 02:01am)
3 learn 2 mix if ur that paranoïd case solved
the fungibility graveyard link does list quite a few instances when using mixer ends up in funds being flagged as tainted and blocked
even bitcointalk few weeks ago started not allowing mixers posts anymore on their forum
then there was the whole tornadocash thing with a dev getting arrested or whatever cause "oh no, he contributed to a software that north korea doing the money laundering thing with"
mixers aint safe and shouldnt be used, just use layer 1 fungible currency like actual cash instead...
This post was edited by derpykitty on Jan 4 2024 09:05pm