Quote (SBD @ Mar 15 2023 04:21am)
You can just say you fucked up understanding what was wrote. I don't really understand why you think there's shame in that.
Just like the other post saying i fucked up when calculating 160K when its also correct.
Its good, no shame.
Still waiting on that link though.
.0005 was misunderstood by me as a statement of the price, rather than the price change
At no point did I dispute the calculation of the trading volume
You are trying to flex superiority in here and you are trying to shame me. It’s important to make it clear what your intention is
IST doesn’t need a website to be validated, its easily verified that its operations produce millions of revenue from government contracts