For the sake of clarity since people posting in here probably are more from the moon lambo crowd and wouldnt be able to pinpoint the subtle sarcasm in a more technical discussion... (what a shame this shit is under "investment & finance" rather than the tech subsection)
My believes (and I could be wrong) is that 2008 - 2011 satoshi was a shared acc between Hal Finney and Adam Back
Rest In Peace Hal... good dude, very sadly passed away on August 28, 2014, 10 days after monero's launch and I think he would have been proud of what the project became after those years ...
That before his passing, he gave away the bitcoins he got under his real identity to his family and gave away the satoshi identity to Adam Back (that the voices in my head likes to refer as "Dark Satoshi")
So my believes is that the 2015 mailing list message as satoshi came from Adam
Some more background..
Original satoshi was a big blocker wanting to compete with Visa/PayPal/MasterCard straight from bitcoin's layer 1
While Adam Back was a small blocker wanting to create layer 2 solutions to bitcoin which he became a sellout and created blockstream in 2014 to hijack bitcoin's development under his corporate interest rather than being a community project, he effectively ruined bitcoin from the inside
So him "declaring bitcoin a failed project" because of someone's influence on a fork is peak irony as blockstream pretty much did even worse the following years
Anyways, this is getting boring up in here, few days ago a btc thread was made in the d2jsp political pard subsection but was moved in here few hours later
And still ain't seeing no mention on how trump just "used bitcoin" to purchase a bunch of burgers for his team or whatever couple days ago
But as was talked about in here, bitcoin cannot be used for that type of stuff no more, spending $20 in fees to purchase a $0.50 coffee really don't make no sense, granted that was for a bunch of burgers for a whole team but still, not everyone that wanna buy a burger would be willing to actually purchase that many burgers so that the $20 network fee would feel less significant... (and in few years a single transaction will be even more in network fees to even hundreds bucks........)
But who knows, trump could have very well just used a centralized and flawed layer 2 solution such as Lightning Network rather than just straight up using bitcoin how it was supposed to be used before it's development got hijacked
Couple other things wanted to point out from Dark Satoshi 2015 mailing list message:
Quote (Satoshi Nakamoto @ August 15 2015)
However I acknowledge that a lot has changed since that time, and new knowledge has been gained that contradicts some of my early opinions. For example I didn't anticipate pooled mining and its effects on the security of the network.
P2Pool would have solved that which existed for bitcoin but unfortunately never got the adoption it deserved...
Past couple years ago an implementation of P2Pool was adapted to monero and grew quite nicely
Quote (Satoshi Nakamoto @ August 15 2015)
I suspect we need a better incentive for users to run nodes instead of relying solely on altruism.
wownero is forcing "solo-mining only" directly from the protocol which is great since it's back to the original design of bitcoin "everyone is a node" (would be way too controversial for today's bitcoin tho)
while for monero, P2Pool helps on that end (which is less extreme than just straight up forcing solo-mining)
alongside with educating people on how to properly use cryptocoins through self-custody of their funds and running their own node
Which on that latter point is a lost cause to do with bitcoiners nowadays due to the switch over "moon lambo wall street mass adoption number go up laser eyes to the moon non-tech savvy getting rich quick not gonna learn about bitcoin's tech" widespread mentality
For context on how bad it got:
- bitcoin: 19k active nodes
- monero: 13k active nodes (was at 11k almost 2 years ago)
- ethereum: 5k active nodes (was at 11k almost 2 years ago)