Quote (TheTechie @ Dec 5 2015 05:52pm)
i was inferring it in the sense that the guy that called the "accused" a retard, was using a argument which was double sided.
ITT: RealDankPot = the accused.
I found something you and RealDankPot have in common.
Quote (TheTechie @ Dec 5 2015 05:53pm)
he also clearly stated 200 x of each rune.
guy's good mannered. and nothing against him!
but the guy that felt scammed had every right to until resolved.
Well maybe next time instead of jumping on a deal that seems unrealistic he should use his brain to reevaluate said deal instead of being a salty little prick about it afterwards.
This post was edited by Santora on Dec 5 2015 03:55pm