apparently, like myplayingname, you can't read either.

i made it pretty clear in my first post that just like python666, i am also iso an impossible iso. and you thought i was seriously iso of an impossible iso?

this isn't exactly rocket science.

wow, you're quite the numbnut i swear.



i'm loving the assumptions. only makes what you said about idiocy and foolishness all the more ironic lol.

This post was edited by elationtheory on Feb 16 2011 02:26pm

I cant read how?
ive gave you straight up answers and criticized your math. How many other people have told you 20+ means 20 or higher? Obviously you cant read.


if i post an iso for grief pb with 39+ ias to meet bp (random example, no factual bp) it doesnt mean only 40ias it means 39ias or 40ias

This post was edited by myplayingname on Feb 16 2011 02:27pm

What was the proof that you were not ISO an impossible ISO?

Remember, it is what is given.

You never once gave a link, not did you poke fun of him in your first post of this thread.

Like I said... Assumed reaction is most definite assumed wrong.

You are just too retarded to comprehend basic principles of attempting a satire of a thread.

Btw, the simple quips you attempt after every time you post is so obvious and childish it almost stunts my intelligence.

once again, since you can't read.

this is NOT 'my' math.

there is a '+' behind the 20 for a reason. because it is more than 20. a symbol denoting '20 or higher' would be a '<' with a stroke under the bottom line.

basic math, people.

i obviously made him feel stupid b4 this thread ( apperantly so did many others )

holy god youre ignorant. Do keboards have the Greater/Less than or equal to signs on them?

>20 = 21 or higher
20+ = 20 or higher, fact of math 20 + X is what 20+ refers to


lmk when you test out of math for college.

reitterating:
if i post an iso for grief pb with 39+ ias to meet bp (random example, no factual bp) it doesnt mean only 40ias it means 39ias or 40ias



This post was edited by myplayingname on Feb 16 2011 02:32pm

He takes so long to reply it is almost as if he writes out what he wants to say, proof reads it, does a second draft, proof reads again, and then does a final draft.

Quite hilarious.

if my 'simple quips' are so obvious and childish, why are you struggling to refute them? so far you've only employed a singular method of argument: the ad hominem argument. if you don't know why that form of argument fails, read up.

you have yet to refute any of my points.

your first premise was that it was that i was ISO an impossible ISO.

then you altered your stand to say that my ISO was actually not impossible, but going by my logic, it was impossible.

then you altered your stand again to say that it was unclear whether this was done as a satire.

i then pointed out the simple statement at the end of my first post. while it does not explicitly state that the nature of this thread is satirical, neither is it very hard to decipher.

if you wish to be spoon-fed like a baby, i apologize for assuming you had a higher intellect. i shall bear in mind this preference of yours in the future.