Quote (Applecrack @ Feb 17 2011 05:16am)
So much trolling in this thread.
it's for +1s, can't you tell?
oh and in case socksandjocks couldn't understand that, that was a joke. this is not really for +1s.
and when i write +1s, myplayingname. i mean it as x + 1, which means that the outcome is always one more more, and not zero or higher.
Quote (myplayingname @ Feb 17 2011 05:17am)
go google definition of pertaining and globular
atleast i can read what it typed on jsp. I swear if it wasnt so unlikely your brain is the size of a pea and your skull is 5 niches thick. Nothing gets through it and you brain cant register anything else than your opinion because it just doesnt have the capabilities in such a small portion
and what does the definition of either have to do with the argument? you're beating the straw man. another example of a fail argument. try again.
This post was edited by elationtheory on Feb 16 2011 03:21pm