I UNDERSTAND IT IS VERY LONG! BUT PLEASE READ ALL!Accused:LaurennBabyy@jsp
http://forums.d2jsp.org/user.php?i=517667Accused as the Multi'sVGF@jsp
http://forums.d2jsp.org/user.php?i=652024Excstasy@jsp
http://forums.d2jsp.org/user.php?i=652018Proof:VGF Joined the EXACT date (the highlighted dates on the s/s) as Excstasy:Proof of Excstasy@jsp's join date:
http://i34.tinypic.com/2en3j84.pngProof of VGF@jsp's join date:
http://i35.tinypic.com/a0cvo5.pngVGF@jsp's first post on jsp
was only 2 hours and 42 minutes before Excstasy@jsp's first post:
VGF@jsp's first post:
http://i33.tinypic.com/insugh.pngExcstasy@jsp's first post:
http://i37.tinypic.com/fucmbn.pngHeres the VERY tricky part that took me some researching on posts in the archives + like 40fg that you can do from the profile links and by putting 2 and 2 together i found the following
READ VERY CAREFULLY SO YOU UNDERSTAND! Here is where the real accusations start:
The first post is LaurennBabyy@jsp saying she is going to quit.
PAY ATTENTION TO THE 235.98FG THAT SHE IS GIVING AWAY!!http://i34.tinypic.com/16atock.pngLater on VGF@jsp got the EXACT amount of fgs as LaurennBabyy@jsp with LaurennBabyy@jsp at 0
(i do not have the s/s that shows that they have the EXACT BUT amount, she admits it herself, and andre32 says it as well but keep paying attention!)http://i36.tinypic.com/2vwxox3.pngNow today November 17, 2009 LaurennBabyy@jsp has 202.98fg and VGF@jsp has 0 according to here:
LaurennBabyy@jsp's gold as of November 17, 2009
http://i33.tinypic.com/dwx45d.pngVGF@jsp's gold as of November 17, 2009
http://i33.tinypic.com/8vwylz.pngThe next tricky part:Shortly after posting in the trading forums on Softcore USWest Non-Ladder alerting to be aware of LaurennBabyy@jsp and her multi's on November 16, 2009, I look at a the USWest Softcore Non-Ladder posts, and Excstasy@jsp has posted a FT list.
The problem with this FT list... it is the EXACT FT list screen shot as LaurennBabyy@jsp's on October 21, 2009
Both screen shots provided here (first Excstasy@jsp then LaurennBabyy@jsp)Excstasy@jsp FT LIST
http://i38.tinypic.com/29p4305.pngLaurennBabyy@jsp FT LIST
http://i35.tinypic.com/25fk3s1.pngNow the last bit of my proof + accusation JUST AS TRICKY AS THE REST!:From what I've noticed, when a d2jsp user closes the browser, instead of logging off directly by clicking the button, it takes 20 minutes to log off the account, which means... if a user is last seen online from the second the browser closes until 20minutes, it logs off the account at EXACTLY 20 minutes, not sooner (unless they open the browser and refresh) or later.
My proof of this simply is BASIC arithmetic of the time that LaurennBabyy@jsp was last seen (highlighted):
http://i36.tinypic.com/30x7wqu.jpgTo the time the 20 minute mark hit
(I ALSO POSTED THE 19MINUTES 59SECONDS AS WELL TO PROVE THAT 20 MINUTES IS THE MARK OF ONLINE
OFFLINE) There was only 19 MINUTES in between when she was last seen (ALSO REALIZE THE LOCAL TIME ON THE JSP S/S You must ADD 10 minutes to the Excstasy@jsp last seen because it took the LaurennBabyy s/s 10 minutes after the 20 minute markIt took 19 minutes to log off of LaurennBabyy@jsp and log on to Excstasy@jsp... (little quick you think? for all we know she coulda gotten food or done something for 19 minutes)
(TAKE NOTE OF THE ONLINE / OFFLINE STATUS BETWEEN S/S)19minutes and 59seconds mark
http://i34.tinypic.com/2e5uold.png20minute mark
http://i37.tinypic.com/o7509c.pngSo in shorter terms...
10minutes (from local time on LaurennBabyy@jsp) +
20minutes (on Excstasy@jsp) =
30minutes last seen on Excstasy@jsp1hour 19minutes -
10 minutes (from the 10 minutes taken off to add to Excstasy@jsp's last seen) -
20minutes (the time after jsp logged her off from closing the browser) =
49minutes last seen on LaurennBabyy@jsp
in that case...
49minutes last seen on LaurennBabyy@jsp -
30minutes last seen on Excstasy@jsp =
19 minutes inbetween log OFF and log ON jsp accounts
[B][COLOR=purple][CENTER]This concludes my Multi User Accusation post...
i really hope you read it all... it took me over 5 hours to do the whole thing, it would mean A LOT to me if you did
